Listening to patients: A qualitative study on diagnostic delay, coping strategies and stigma in early‐onset colorectal cancer

Participants from all cancer stages and aged between 30 and 50 years were recruited. We developed three main themes from the collected data: diagnostic delay, coping mechanisms and stigmatisation. Despite access to a well-resourced healthcare system, study participants experienced diagnostic delays, indicating the need for increased physician awareness and improved risk-based screening for high-risk individuals. Participants' key coping strategies included self-advocacy and participating in medical decision-making, like prioritising fertility preservation over rushed treatment. Participants reported fear of stigmatisation and isolation after being diagnosed. Such stigma manifested in concerns over alopecia or living with an ostomy. Finally, participants experienced an internal shift in personal priorities resulting in post-traumatic growth despite cancer diagnosis CONCLUSIONS: EOCC challenges current clinical practices. Better physician awareness, risk-factor-based screening policies, integrated discussions about individual treatment such as potential fertility issues and targeting stigma are critical for improving the EOCC patients' journey.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Colorectal Disease
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.70285
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Listening to patients: A qualitative study on diagnostic delay, coping strategies and stigma in early‐onset colorectal cancer

Beat Peter Müller-Stich, Stephanie Taha‐Mehlitz, Daniel Christian Steinemann, Amanda K. Huber et al.
1 citations
Colorectal Disease
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
article

Listening to patients: A qualitative study on diagnostic delay, coping strategies and stigma in early‐onset colorectal cancer

Beat Peter Müller-Stich, Stephanie Taha‐Mehlitz, Daniel Christian Steinemann, Amanda K. Huber, Jennifer M. Klasen, Raffaele Galli, Sofia Teixeira da Cunha, C. T. Viehl, A F Muller, Lukas Eisner, Mathias Worni, Mark Henschel, Suna Erdem, M. Strauß, Sebastian Happ, Daniel Rodjakovic, Thomas Simon, Hélène Gros, J.‐M. Gass
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Participants from all cancer stages and aged between 30 and 50 years were recruited. We developed three main themes from the collected data: diagnostic delay, coping mechanisms and stigmatisation. Despite access to a well-resourced healthcare system, study participants experienced diagnostic delays, indicating the need for increased physician awareness and improved risk-based screening for high-risk individuals. Participants' key coping strategies included self-advocacy and participating in medical decision-making, like prioritising fertility preservation over rushed treatment. Participants reported fear of stigmatisation and isolation after being diagnosed. Such stigma manifested in concerns over alopecia or living with an ostomy. Finally, participants experienced an internal shift in personal priorities resulting in post-traumatic growth despite cancer diagnosis CONCLUSIONS: EOCC challenges current clinical practices. Better physician awareness, risk-factor-based screening policies, integrated discussions about individual treatment such as potential fertility issues and targeting stigma are critical for improving the EOCC patients' journey.

Colorectal DiseaseVol. 27(11)
University of Bern (CH), University of Lucerne (CH), University of Basel (CH), University Hospital of Basel (CH), Kantonsspital Baselland (CH), Hirslanden Klinik Beau-Site (CH), Luzerner Kantonsspital (CH), St. Claraspital (CH), Kantonsschule Olten (CH), Spital Uster (CH), Digestive Care (United States) (US), Spitalzentrum Centre hospitalier Biel- Bienne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.