Polarisation, filter bubbles and radicalisation on YouTube: a systematic literature review

Polarisation and online radicalisation pose significant threats in the modern world. YouTube, particularly its recommendation system - which drives approximately 70% of the platform's audience - has become a focal point of concern. This study presents a systematic literature review of 56 papers, addressing three core research questions to examine the extent, data collection methods, and quantification of problematic content. Our analysis identifies politics as the most polarised domain, revealing a notable convergence of polarisation and disinformation themes. We further emphasise the influential role of other social networks in spreading problematic content. The findings underscore the necessity of distinguishing between polarisation and misinformation in research methodologies, offering a comprehensive overview of the field's current state.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Web Based Communities
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijwbc.2025.149347
Primary Topic
Humor Studies and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polarisation, filter bubbles and radicalisation on YouTube: a systematic literature review

Ana Cristina Bicharra García, Laynara Santos Almeida, Jefferson Elbert Simões
International Journal of Web Based Communities
Humor Studies and Applications
article

Polarisation, filter bubbles and radicalisation on YouTube: a systematic literature review

Ana Cristina Bicharra García, Laynara Santos Almeida, Jefferson Elbert Simões
article en

Abstract

Polarisation and online radicalisation pose significant threats in the modern world. YouTube, particularly its recommendation system - which drives approximately 70% of the platform's audience - has become a focal point of concern. This study presents a systematic literature review of 56 papers, addressing three core research questions to examine the extent, data collection methods, and quantification of problematic content. Our analysis identifies politics as the most polarised domain, revealing a notable convergence of polarisation and disinformation themes. We further emphasise the influential role of other social networks in spreading problematic content. The findings underscore the necessity of distinguishing between polarisation and misinformation in research methodologies, offering a comprehensive overview of the field's current state.

International Journal of Web Based CommunitiesVol. 21(4)
Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Humor Studies and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Polarisation, filter bubbles and radicalisation on YouTube: a systematic literature review — Ana Cristina Bicharra García, Laynara Santos Almeida, et al. · International Journal of Web Based Communities (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS