Embracing Asset Perspectives in Science Education Research: A Call for Change

ABSTRACT This editorial urges a shift in science education research from deficit‐oriented framings, which portray learners in terms of what they lack, to asset‐based perspectives that recognize and build on the cultural, social, and cognitive resources learners bring. Deficit framings obscure diverse ways of knowing and reinforce systemic inequities through narrow accountability structures. Drawing on recent studies, we show how asset perspectives can reveal learners' strengths, challenge dominant norms, and support equity‐focused educational change. We provide practical guidance for designing asset‐framed research questions, selecting appropriate theoretical lenses, and making methodological choices that center participants' voices and contexts. Reflecting on our own prior work, we illustrate how reframing findings around existing strengths can transform both analysis and implications. By advancing research that honors learners' competencies, identities, and experiences, the field can promote inclusion, justice, and meaningful participation in science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Education
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.70031
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embracing Asset Perspectives in Science Education Research: A Call for Change

David Stroupe, Scott McDonald, Ron Gray
2 citations
Science Education
Science Education and Pedagogy
17.85
article

Embracing Asset Perspectives in Science Education Research: A Call for Change

David Stroupe, Scott McDonald, Ron Gray
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This editorial urges a shift in science education research from deficit‐oriented framings, which portray learners in terms of what they lack, to asset‐based perspectives that recognize and build on the cultural, social, and cognitive resources learners bring. Deficit framings obscure diverse ways of knowing and reinforce systemic inequities through narrow accountability structures. Drawing on recent studies, we show how asset perspectives can reveal learners' strengths, challenge dominant norms, and support equity‐focused educational change. We provide practical guidance for designing asset‐framed research questions, selecting appropriate theoretical lenses, and making methodological choices that center participants' voices and contexts. Reflecting on our own prior work, we illustrate how reframing findings around existing strengths can transform both analysis and implications. By advancing research that honors learners' competencies, identities, and experiences, the field can promote inclusion, justice, and meaningful participation in science.

Science EducationVol. 110(2)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Northern Arizona University (US), University of Utah (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Science Education and Pedagogy
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.