Automatic Apparent Nasal Index from Single Facial Photographs Using a Lightweight Deep Learning Pipeline: A Pilot Study

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Quantifying nasal proportions is central to facial plastic and reconstructive surgery, yet manual measurements are time-consuming and variable. We sought to develop a simple, reproducible deep learning pipeline that localizes the nose in a single frontal photograph and automatically computes the two-dimensional, photograph-derived apparent nasal index (aNI)-width/height × 100-enabling classification into five standard anthropometric categories. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: From CelebA we curated 29,998 high-quality near-frontal images (training 20,998; validation 5999; test 3001). Nose masks were manually annotated with the VGG Image Annotator and rasterized to binary masks. Ground-truth aNI was computed from the mask's axis-aligned bounding box. A lightweight one-class YOLOv8n detector was trained to localize the nose; predicted aNI was computed from the detected bounding box. Performance was assessed on the held-out test set using detection coverage and mAP, agreement metrics between detector- and mask-based aNI (MAE, RMSE, R<sup>2</sup>; Bland-Altman), and five-class classification metrics (accuracy, macro-F1). <i>Results</i>: The detector returned at least one accepted nose box in 3000/3001 test images (99.97% coverage). Agreement with ground truth was strong: MAE 3.04 nasal index units (95% CI 2.95-3.14), RMSE 4.05, and R<sup>2</sup> 0.819. Bland-Altman analysis showed a small negative bias (-0.40, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.26) with limits of agreement -8.30 to 7.50 (95% CIs -8.54 to -8.05 and 7.25 to 7.74). After excluding out-of-range cases (<40.0), five-class classification on n = 2976 images achieved macro-F1 0.705 (95% CI 0.608-0.772) and 80.7% accuracy; errors were predominantly adjacent-class swaps, consistent with the small aNI error. Additional analyses confirmed strong ordinal agreement (weighted κ = 0.71 linear, 0.78 quadratic; Spearman ρ = 0.76) and near-perfect adjacent-class accuracy (0.999); performance remained stable when thresholds were shifted ±2 NI units and across sex and age subgroups. <i>Conclusions:</i> A compact detector can deliver near-universal nose localization and accurate automatic estimation of the nasal index from a single photograph, enabling reliable five-class categorization without manual measurements. The approach is fast, reproducible, and promising as a calibrated decision-support adjunct for surgical planning, outcomes tracking, and large-scale morphometric research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61111922
Primary Topic
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automatic Apparent Nasal Index from Single Facial Photographs Using a Lightweight Deep Learning Pipeline: A Pilot Study

Norbert R. Kübler, Max Wilkat, Christoph K. Sproll, Julian Lommen et al.
Medicina
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
article

Automatic Apparent Nasal Index from Single Facial Photographs Using a Lightweight Deep Learning Pipeline: A Pilot Study

Norbert R. Kübler, Max Wilkat, Christoph K. Sproll, Julian Lommen, Michael Vollmer, Lara Schorn, Hamza Eren Güzel, Babak Saravi, Daman Deep Singh, Andreas Vollmer, Felix Schrader
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Quantifying nasal proportions is central to facial plastic and reconstructive surgery, yet manual measurements are time-consuming and variable. We sought to develop a simple, reproducible deep learning pipeline that localizes the nose in a single frontal photograph and automatically computes the two-dimensional, photograph-derived apparent nasal index (aNI)-width/height × 100-enabling classification into five standard anthropometric categories. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: From CelebA we curated 29,998 high-quality near-frontal images (training 20,998; validation 5999; test 3001). Nose masks were manually annotated with the VGG Image Annotator and rasterized to binary masks. Ground-truth aNI was computed from the mask's axis-aligned bounding box. A lightweight one-class YOLOv8n detector was trained to localize the nose; predicted aNI was computed from the detected bounding box. Performance was assessed on the held-out test set using detection coverage and mAP, agreement metrics between detector- and mask-based aNI (MAE, RMSE, R<sup>2</sup>; Bland-Altman), and five-class classification metrics (accuracy, macro-F1). <i>Results</i>: The detector returned at least one accepted nose box in 3000/3001 test images (99.97% coverage). Agreement with ground truth was strong: MAE 3.04 nasal index units (95% CI 2.95-3.14), RMSE 4.05, and R<sup>2</sup> 0.819. Bland-Altman analysis showed a small negative bias (-0.40, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.26) with limits of agreement -8.30 to 7.50 (95% CIs -8.54 to -8.05 and 7.25 to 7.74). After excluding out-of-range cases (<40.0), five-class classification on n = 2976 images achieved macro-F1 0.705 (95% CI 0.608-0.772) and 80.7% accuracy; errors were predominantly adjacent-class swaps, consistent with the small aNI error. Additional analyses confirmed strong ordinal agreement (weighted κ = 0.71 linear, 0.78 quadratic; Spearman ρ = 0.76) and near-perfect adjacent-class accuracy (0.999); performance remained stable when thresholds were shifted ±2 NI units and across sex and age subgroups. <i>Conclusions:</i> A compact detector can deliver near-universal nose localization and accurate automatic estimation of the nasal index from a single photograph, enabling reliable five-class categorization without manual measurements. The approach is fast, reproducible, and promising as a calibrated decision-support adjunct for surgical planning, outcomes tracking, and large-scale morphometric research.

MedicinaVol. 61(11)
Izmir University (TR), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), University Children's Hospital Tübingen (DE), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), University of Tübingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.