Wild edible plants selection of Tibetan and Naxi people in Northwest Yunnan, China

Wild edible plants are important resources for dietary diversity and health worldwide. However, little is known about the selection process of these species for health and nutrition by human communities. We employed negative binomial, Poisson models, and Bayesian approaches to test for a non-random selection of wild edible plants among the Tibetan and Naxi people in Northwest Yunnan, China, and explore biocultural drivers of plant selection process by comparing the similarity and differences of the two cultural groups. Our results support the non-random plant selection theory. 418 (94 families, 226 genera) wild edible species of the 7365 (208 families, 1379 genera) naturally occurring plant species in the study area are used by Tibetan and/or Naxi people. Six families, 16 genera, and 17 species were preferred by both groups, while considerable heterogeneity remains. Ecological and cultural traits are equally important for shaping plant selection process of the two cultural groups; shared plant selection preferences may associate with common nutritional needs and cultural exchanges, while the differences may result from adaptation to particular environments and cultural preferences. It is worth further testing whether socio-cultural or ecological traits are the main drivers for plant selection of various cultural groups living in northwest Yunnan.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-025-00816-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wild edible plants selection of Tibetan and Naxi people in Northwest Yunnan, China

Yinxian Shi, Prateep Panyadee, Yao Fu, Aye Mya Mon et al.
1 citations
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
1.75
article

Wild edible plants selection of Tibetan and Naxi people in Northwest Yunnan, China

Yinxian Shi, Prateep Panyadee, Yao Fu, Aye Mya Mon, Cory Whitney, Yanan Wang, Jinlong Zhang, Xuefei Yang, Yingfeng Bi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Wild edible plants are important resources for dietary diversity and health worldwide. However, little is known about the selection process of these species for health and nutrition by human communities. We employed negative binomial, Poisson models, and Bayesian approaches to test for a non-random selection of wild edible plants among the Tibetan and Naxi people in Northwest Yunnan, China, and explore biocultural drivers of plant selection process by comparing the similarity and differences of the two cultural groups. Our results support the non-random plant selection theory. 418 (94 families, 226 genera) wild edible species of the 7365 (208 families, 1379 genera) naturally occurring plant species in the study area are used by Tibetan and/or Naxi people. Six families, 16 genera, and 17 species were preferred by both groups, while considerable heterogeneity remains. Ecological and cultural traits are equally important for shaping plant selection process of the two cultural groups; shared plant selection preferences may associate with common nutritional needs and cultural exchanges, while the differences may result from adaptation to particular environments and cultural preferences. It is worth further testing whether socio-cultural or ecological traits are the main drivers for plant selection of various cultural groups living in northwest Yunnan.

Journal of Ethnobiology and EthnomedicineVol. 21(1)
University of Bonn (DE), Kunming Institute of Botany (CN), Kunming Institute of Zoology (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (GB), Yezin Agricultural University (MM)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.