Pathological response and metabolites’ prognostic role in HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant pyrotinib, trastuzumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin: a single-arm phase II trial

The trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in combination with trastuzumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin (TCbHPy) in the neoadjuvant setting (ChiCTR2100043523), as well as the role of metabolites in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). In this study, treatment-naive women with HER2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer (II–III) were enrolled and received six neoadjuvant cycles of pyrotinib (400 mg) once daily, plus trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 6 mg/kg), nab-paclitaxel (260 mg/m2), and carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] = 6) every 3 weeks. Plasma samples from 26 patients were collected at baseline, and serum metabolites were analyzed based on liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry data. The primary endpoint was the total pathological complete response (tpCR; ypT0/is and ypN0) rate. Secondary endpoints include objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), breast pCR (bpCR; ypT0/is) rate, safety, and the predictive effect of metabolites on NAT. Among the 35 patients enrolled, the tpCR rate was 55.9% (19/34). For women with hormone receptor–negative and–positive tumors, the tpCR rates were 64.7% and 47.1% (P = 0.5034). The bpCR, ORR, and DCR were 61.8%, 91.2%, and 100.0%, respectively. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were diarrhea (17.6%), vomiting (17.6%), and alopecia (11.8%), with 2 patients experiencing neutropenic fever. There were significant differences in plasma metabolic profiles between tpCR patients and non-tpCR patients at baseline. These differentially expressed metabolites were markedly enriched in the ABC transporter pathway. The area under the curve values for discriminating the tpCR and non-tPCR groups from the NAT of the single potential metabolite [spermidine and l-isoleucine] or combined panel of the two metabolites were greater than 0.875, implying that spermidine and l-isoleucine could be useful biomarkers for distinguishing between non-sensitive and sensitive individuals. Neoadjuvant TCbHPy is an effective and safe treatment option for HER2-positive breast cancer. Serum-metabolomics could be a powerful tool for exploring informative biomarkers for predicting efficacy, and facilitate the development of new treatment targets for insensitive patients. A randomized controlled trial is necessary to validate our findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Breast Cancer Research
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-025-02137-z
Primary Topic
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pathological response and metabolites’ prognostic role in HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant pyrotinib, trastuzumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin: a single-arm phase II trial

Xianjun Pan, Mei Liu, La Zou, Xiaohua Zeng et al.
Breast Cancer Research
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
article

Pathological response and metabolites’ prognostic role in HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant pyrotinib, trastuzumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin: a single-arm phase II trial

Xianjun Pan, Mei Liu, La Zou, Xiaohua Zeng, Wenqi Zhou, Yeli Yue, Ningning Zhang, Jing Wu, Xinrui Liang, Maoshan Chen, Yongchun Deng
article en

Abstract

The trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in combination with trastuzumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin (TCbHPy) in the neoadjuvant setting (ChiCTR2100043523), as well as the role of metabolites in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). In this study, treatment-naive women with HER2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer (II–III) were enrolled and received six neoadjuvant cycles of pyrotinib (400 mg) once daily, plus trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 6 mg/kg), nab-paclitaxel (260 mg/m2), and carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] = 6) every 3 weeks. Plasma samples from 26 patients were collected at baseline, and serum metabolites were analyzed based on liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry data. The primary endpoint was the total pathological complete response (tpCR; ypT0/is and ypN0) rate. Secondary endpoints include objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), breast pCR (bpCR; ypT0/is) rate, safety, and the predictive effect of metabolites on NAT. Among the 35 patients enrolled, the tpCR rate was 55.9% (19/34). For women with hormone receptor–negative and–positive tumors, the tpCR rates were 64.7% and 47.1% (P = 0.5034). The bpCR, ORR, and DCR were 61.8%, 91.2%, and 100.0%, respectively. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were diarrhea (17.6%), vomiting (17.6%), and alopecia (11.8%), with 2 patients experiencing neutropenic fever. There were significant differences in plasma metabolic profiles between tpCR patients and non-tpCR patients at baseline. These differentially expressed metabolites were markedly enriched in the ABC transporter pathway. The area under the curve values for discriminating the tpCR and non-tPCR groups from the NAT of the single potential metabolite [spermidine and l-isoleucine] or combined panel of the two metabolites were greater than 0.875, implying that spermidine and l-isoleucine could be useful biomarkers for distinguishing between non-sensitive and sensitive individuals. Neoadjuvant TCbHPy is an effective and safe treatment option for HER2-positive breast cancer. Serum-metabolomics could be a powerful tool for exploring informative biomarkers for predicting efficacy, and facilitate the development of new treatment targets for insensitive patients. A randomized controlled trial is necessary to validate our findings.

Breast Cancer ResearchVol. 27(1)
Suizhou Central Hospital (CN), Chongqing Cancer Hospital (CN)
Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.