Initial Expectations and Confidence Affect the Formation of Novel Self-Beliefs and Their Revision

Human self-beliefs hinge on social feedback, but their formation and revision are not solely based on new information. Biases during learning, such as confirming initial expectations, can lead to inaccurate beliefs. This study uses computational modeling to explore how initial expectations about one's own and others' abilities and confidence in these beliefs affect processes of belief formation and belief revision in novel behavioral domains. In the first session, participants formed performance beliefs through trial-by-trial feedback. In the second session, feedback contingencies were reversed to promote a revision of beliefs. Results showed that people form and revise beliefs in a confirmatory manner, with lower initial expectations being linked to more negatively biased belief formation and revision, while growing confidence strengthened these beliefs over time. Once formed, these beliefs proved resistant to change even when faced with contradictory feedback. The findings suggest that newly formed beliefs become entrenched and resistant to new, contradictory information in a short period of time. Understanding how self-beliefs are formed, the role that confidence plays in this process, and why established beliefs are difficult to revise can inform the development of interventions aimed at promoting more adaptive learning in educational, clinical, and social contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Mind
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi.a.36
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Child and Animal Learning Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Initial Expectations and Confidence Affect the Formation of Novel Self-Beliefs and Their Revision

Frieder M. Paulus, Laura Müller‐Pinzler, Christoph W. Korn, Alexander Schröder et al.
1 citations
Open Mind
Child and Animal Learning Development
3.44
article

Initial Expectations and Confidence Affect the Formation of Novel Self-Beliefs and Their Revision

Frieder M. Paulus, Laura Müller‐Pinzler, Christoph W. Korn, Alexander Schröder, Finn Luebber, David Sören Stolz, Nora Czekalla, Sören Krach, Annalina V. Mayer, Susanne Diekelmann, Lei Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Human self-beliefs hinge on social feedback, but their formation and revision are not solely based on new information. Biases during learning, such as confirming initial expectations, can lead to inaccurate beliefs. This study uses computational modeling to explore how initial expectations about one's own and others' abilities and confidence in these beliefs affect processes of belief formation and belief revision in novel behavioral domains. In the first session, participants formed performance beliefs through trial-by-trial feedback. In the second session, feedback contingencies were reversed to promote a revision of beliefs. Results showed that people form and revise beliefs in a confirmatory manner, with lower initial expectations being linked to more negatively biased belief formation and revision, while growing confidence strengthened these beliefs over time. Once formed, these beliefs proved resistant to change even when faced with contradictory feedback. The findings suggest that newly formed beliefs become entrenched and resistant to new, contradictory information in a short period of time. Understanding how self-beliefs are formed, the role that confidence plays in this process, and why established beliefs are difficult to revise can inform the development of interventions aimed at promoting more adaptive learning in educational, clinical, and social contexts.

Open MindVol. 9
Heidelberg University (DE), Social Neuroscience Lab (DE), University of Birmingham (GB), University of Tübingen (DE), University of Lübeck (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Universität zu Lübeck
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Child and Animal Learning Development
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.