Synergies and trade-offs of integrating bio-formulations with mineral fertilizers in soybean under the climate crisis: implications for productivity, profitability, and nutrient-use efficiency

Soybean productivity is often constrained by inefficient nutrient management and soil degradation. The overuse of chemical fertilizers negatively impacts soil health and sustainability. Bio-formulation-based nutrient management offers a promising alternative to improve crop productivity while enhancing soil biological activity. However, research on integrating bio-formulations with reduced fertilizer inputs remains limited. This study aimed to assess the effect of bio-formulation-based management strategies on soybean production system. The hypothesis tested whether integrating bio-formulations + 75% RDF (recommended dose of fertilizers) could achieve similar or superior productivity and profitability compared to conventional 100% RDF applications. A 3-year (2021–2023) field experiment was conducted at the ICAR-IIARI, New Delhi, with seven nutrient management scenarios [NMSc1-control; NMSc2-100% fertilizer (RDF); NMSc3-75% RDF; NMSc4-75% RDF+Bio Zn; NMSc5-75% RDF+ Bio NPK; NMSc6-75% RDF + Bio Zn + Bio NPK; NMSc7-75 % RDF + Rhizobium + MDSR14 + Burkholderiaarboris (12c)]. The bio-formulation strategy NMSc6 (75% RDF + Bio Zn + Bio NPK) recorded the highest crop growth rate (16.4 g m -2 day -1 ) and seed yield (3.1 t ha -1 ), outperforming 100% RDF (NMSc2) by 4.0–8.0%. Nitrogen uptake (280.2 kg ha -1 ), phosphorus (P) uptake (21.2 kg ha -1 ), and potassium (K) uptake (142.1 kg ha -1 ) were maximized in NMSc6. The net returns increased by 12.5% compared to conventional RDF, and production efficiency improved by 6.2%. Integrating bio-formulations with reduced fertilizer inputs enhances soybean productivity, soil health, and economic returns while reducing dependency on synthetic fertilizers. NMSc6 emerged as the most effective strategy, balancing high yield with sustainable resource use. • NMSc6 (75% RDF + Bio Zn + Bio NPK) increased soybean productivity by 4.0–8.0% over 100% RDF. • NMSc6 recorded the highest CGR (16.4 g m -2 day -1 ) and RGR. • NMSc6 improved net returns by 7.9–12.5% compared to 100% RDF. • NMSc6 increased N (103.7%), P (107.8%), and K (117.2%) uptake. • NMSc6 reduced fertilizer input by 25% without yield penalty

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.102474
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Soybean genetics and cultivation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synergies and trade-offs of integrating bio-formulations with mineral fertilizers in soybean under the climate crisis: implications for productivity, profitability, and nutrient-use efficiency

Rakesh Kumar Verma, Sanjay Singh Rathore, Vijay Singh Meena, Kadagonda Nithinkumar et al.
1 citations
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Soybean genetics and cultivation
1.75
article

Synergies and trade-offs of integrating bio-formulations with mineral fertilizers in soybean under the climate crisis: implications for productivity, profitability, and nutrient-use efficiency

Rakesh Kumar Verma, Sanjay Singh Rathore, Vijay Singh Meena, Kadagonda Nithinkumar, Anchal Dass, Arjun Singh, G.A. Rajana
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Soybean productivity is often constrained by inefficient nutrient management and soil degradation. The overuse of chemical fertilizers negatively impacts soil health and sustainability. Bio-formulation-based nutrient management offers a promising alternative to improve crop productivity while enhancing soil biological activity. However, research on integrating bio-formulations with reduced fertilizer inputs remains limited. This study aimed to assess the effect of bio-formulation-based management strategies on soybean production system. The hypothesis tested whether integrating bio-formulations + 75% RDF (recommended dose of fertilizers) could achieve similar or superior productivity and profitability compared to conventional 100% RDF applications. A 3-year (2021–2023) field experiment was conducted at the ICAR-IIARI, New Delhi, with seven nutrient management scenarios [NMSc1-control; NMSc2-100% fertilizer (RDF); NMSc3-75% RDF; NMSc4-75% RDF+Bio Zn; NMSc5-75% RDF+ Bio NPK; NMSc6-75% RDF + Bio Zn + Bio NPK; NMSc7-75 % RDF + Rhizobium + MDSR14 + Burkholderiaarboris (12c)]. The bio-formulation strategy NMSc6 (75% RDF + Bio Zn + Bio NPK) recorded the highest crop growth rate (16.4 g m -2 day -1 ) and seed yield (3.1 t ha -1 ), outperforming 100% RDF (NMSc2) by 4.0–8.0%. Nitrogen uptake (280.2 kg ha -1 ), phosphorus (P) uptake (21.2 kg ha -1 ), and potassium (K) uptake (142.1 kg ha -1 ) were maximized in NMSc6. The net returns increased by 12.5% compared to conventional RDF, and production efficiency improved by 6.2%. Integrating bio-formulations with reduced fertilizer inputs enhances soybean productivity, soil health, and economic returns while reducing dependency on synthetic fertilizers. NMSc6 emerged as the most effective strategy, balancing high yield with sustainable resource use. • NMSc6 (75% RDF + Bio Zn + Bio NPK) increased soybean productivity by 4.0–8.0% over 100% RDF. • NMSc6 recorded the highest CGR (16.4 g m -2 day -1 ) and RGR. • NMSc6 improved net returns by 7.9–12.5% compared to 100% RDF. • NMSc6 increased N (103.7%), P (107.8%), and K (117.2%) uptake. • NMSc6 reduced fertilizer input by 25% without yield penalty

Journal of Agriculture and Food ResearchVol. 24
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (IN), Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Ghatkhed Amravati (IN), Borlaug Institute for South Asia (IN), Indian Institute of Soybean Research (IN), Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Soybean genetics and cultivation
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.