Generative AI to bridge the educational divide: Personalized learning and challenges

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly transforming education by enabling adaptive tutoring, personalized feedback, and scalable resource creation. Yet its benefits are unevenly distributed: without safeguards, the same systems that promise to close learning gaps may reinforce them. This article presents a systematic review of 75 peer-reviewed studies published between 2016 and 2024, focusing specifically on GenAI through an equity lens. Four main opportunities were identified: personalized learning (60 % of studies), teacher assistance and efficiency (51 %), expanded access and inclusion (44 %), and learning analytics (33 %). Alongside these benefits, significant challenges were reported, including data privacy risks (56 %), algorithmic bias (52 %), depersonalization of learning (48 %), the digital divide (48 %), and transparency and accountability gaps (36 %). The synthesis reveals that GenAI's educational impact is shaped by three intersecting dimensions – personalization, fairness, and access – whose intersections determine whether GenAI narrows or widens learning inequalities. To achieve equitable outcomes, schools and ministries must prioritize governance measures such as privacy safeguards, bias audits, professional development, and infrastructure investment, since equity will not emerge automatically from GenAI adoption; it must be intentionally designed, implemented, and monitored across policy, practice, and pedagogy. Future research should move beyond descriptive accounts to include pragmatic trials in low-resource contexts, longitudinal equity studies, and governance frameworks that integrate technical safeguards with participatory oversight. By addressing these priorities, GenAI can shift from a tool of potential exclusion to a driver of equity and inclusion in education worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102140
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI to bridge the educational divide: Personalized learning and challenges

Aziz Mimoudi
3 citations
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
7.44
article

Generative AI to bridge the educational divide: Personalized learning and challenges

Aziz Mimoudi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly transforming education by enabling adaptive tutoring, personalized feedback, and scalable resource creation. Yet its benefits are unevenly distributed: without safeguards, the same systems that promise to close learning gaps may reinforce them. This article presents a systematic review of 75 peer-reviewed studies published between 2016 and 2024, focusing specifically on GenAI through an equity lens. Four main opportunities were identified: personalized learning (60 % of studies), teacher assistance and efficiency (51 %), expanded access and inclusion (44 %), and learning analytics (33 %). Alongside these benefits, significant challenges were reported, including data privacy risks (56 %), algorithmic bias (52 %), depersonalization of learning (48 %), the digital divide (48 %), and transparency and accountability gaps (36 %). The synthesis reveals that GenAI's educational impact is shaped by three intersecting dimensions – personalization, fairness, and access – whose intersections determine whether GenAI narrows or widens learning inequalities. To achieve equitable outcomes, schools and ministries must prioritize governance measures such as privacy safeguards, bias audits, professional development, and infrastructure investment, since equity will not emerge automatically from GenAI adoption; it must be intentionally designed, implemented, and monitored across policy, practice, and pedagogy. Future research should move beyond descriptive accounts to include pragmatic trials in low-resource contexts, longitudinal equity studies, and governance frameworks that integrate technical safeguards with participatory oversight. By addressing these priorities, GenAI can shift from a tool of potential exclusion to a driver of equity and inclusion in education worldwide.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 12
Université Mohammed VI Polytechnique (MA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.