Riparian forest buffer management in Norway: Evaluating adherence to certification standards

• Evaluating harvest impact on buffer composition under certification. • 45 % of the buffers complied with the certification requirements. • Pre-harvest buffer composition did not explain narrow buffer width. • Structural variation in tree diameter was maintained after harvest. Riparian buffers are important for maintaining the ecological function of the riparian forest surrounding watercourses upon harvest. The Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC), the world’s largest certification system by forest area, regulates harvest along watercourses. In Norway, riparian buffers are managed through a combination of detailed requirements and subjective assessments. Despite the importance of riparian buffers, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding their management and how well subjective assessments align with certification intentions. This study aims to investigate how subjective assessments are applied to riparian buffers in Norwegian forestry and whether their management complies with the 2015 PEFC standard. We carried out inventories of 27 randomly selected stands in South-Eastern Norway, focusing on species composition, stand structure, and site conditions. We found that the mean and median buffer widths were 7.0 m and 5.7 m, respectively. Eighty-five percent of the buffers were narrower than the prescribed standard width of minimum 10 m, yet 46 % of the stands still met certification requirements due to exemptions allowing reduced buffer widths. While the largest trees were harvested, overall composition of the riparian buffer and tree structure were largely maintained after harvest. We found no site characteristics that could explain the narrow buffers and the results indicate that a buffer width norm narrower than the requirement has been established. The PEFC water-protection requirements are yet to be fully implemented in forest management in Norway, and improvements are warranted from companies responsible for forest planning, harvest and silviculture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trees Forests and People
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2025.101069
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Riparian forest buffer management in Norway: Evaluating adherence to certification standards

Hanne K. Sjølie, Ane Christensen Tange
Trees Forests and People
Forest Management and Policy
article

Riparian forest buffer management in Norway: Evaluating adherence to certification standards

Hanne K. Sjølie, Ane Christensen Tange
article en

Abstract

• Evaluating harvest impact on buffer composition under certification. • 45 % of the buffers complied with the certification requirements. • Pre-harvest buffer composition did not explain narrow buffer width. • Structural variation in tree diameter was maintained after harvest. Riparian buffers are important for maintaining the ecological function of the riparian forest surrounding watercourses upon harvest. The Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC), the world’s largest certification system by forest area, regulates harvest along watercourses. In Norway, riparian buffers are managed through a combination of detailed requirements and subjective assessments. Despite the importance of riparian buffers, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding their management and how well subjective assessments align with certification intentions. This study aims to investigate how subjective assessments are applied to riparian buffers in Norwegian forestry and whether their management complies with the 2015 PEFC standard. We carried out inventories of 27 randomly selected stands in South-Eastern Norway, focusing on species composition, stand structure, and site conditions. We found that the mean and median buffer widths were 7.0 m and 5.7 m, respectively. Eighty-five percent of the buffers were narrower than the prescribed standard width of minimum 10 m, yet 46 % of the stands still met certification requirements due to exemptions allowing reduced buffer widths. While the largest trees were harvested, overall composition of the riparian buffer and tree structure were largely maintained after harvest. We found no site characteristics that could explain the narrow buffers and the results indicate that a buffer width norm narrower than the requirement has been established. The PEFC water-protection requirements are yet to be fully implemented in forest management in Norway, and improvements are warranted from companies responsible for forest planning, harvest and silviculture.

Trees Forests and PeopleVol. 22
Glommen Skog (Norway) (NO), University of Inland Norway (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Forest Management and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.