Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A systematic Review of Progress and Challenges

This work employs a multidisciplinary approach to identify research gaps in the existing literature by presenting a systematic review of systematic reviews on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first thorough meta-review that combines the findings of several excellent reviews to offer a more elevated viewpoint on the goals and difficulties facing the area. The review covers empirical studies published between 2021 and 2023, focusing on high-quality sources. An initial pool of 997 entries was screened across multiple databases, yielding 928 unique articles after duplicate removal. Ultimately, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in depth. The quality assessment confirmed that all selected reviews adhered to established methodological standards. The key findings show XAI's broad uses, which range from increasing trust and transparency to assisting with financial and management decision-making. The prevalence of healthcare-focused studies emphasizes XAI's importance in enhancing interpretability, fairness, regulatory compliance, and personalized treatment options. Commonly used techniques include visual explanation tools, interpretable machine learning models, and model-agnostic approaches. While the review offers valuable insights, it acknowledges limitations such as its reliance on Q1 journals and the exclusion of broader sources, which may affect comprehensiveness. To advance the field, the study recommends expanding future research to underrepresented domains like autonomous vehicles, defense, and smart cities. It also calls for methodological innovation to enhance accessibility, fairness, privacy, and the development of intuitive explanation strategies. Addressing these gaps can significantly improve the trustworthiness and effectiveness of AI systems across sectors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intelligent Systems with Applications
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2025.200595
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A systematic Review of Progress and Challenges

Khaled Shaalan, Khaled Abdelqader, Azza Mohamed
5 citations
Intelligent Systems with Applications
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
12.40
article

Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A systematic Review of Progress and Challenges

Khaled Shaalan, Khaled Abdelqader, Azza Mohamed
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This work employs a multidisciplinary approach to identify research gaps in the existing literature by presenting a systematic review of systematic reviews on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first thorough meta-review that combines the findings of several excellent reviews to offer a more elevated viewpoint on the goals and difficulties facing the area. The review covers empirical studies published between 2021 and 2023, focusing on high-quality sources. An initial pool of 997 entries was screened across multiple databases, yielding 928 unique articles after duplicate removal. Ultimately, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in depth. The quality assessment confirmed that all selected reviews adhered to established methodological standards. The key findings show XAI's broad uses, which range from increasing trust and transparency to assisting with financial and management decision-making. The prevalence of healthcare-focused studies emphasizes XAI's importance in enhancing interpretability, fairness, regulatory compliance, and personalized treatment options. Commonly used techniques include visual explanation tools, interpretable machine learning models, and model-agnostic approaches. While the review offers valuable insights, it acknowledges limitations such as its reliance on Q1 journals and the exclusion of broader sources, which may affect comprehensiveness. To advance the field, the study recommends expanding future research to underrepresented domains like autonomous vehicles, defense, and smart cities. It also calls for methodological innovation to enhance accessibility, fairness, privacy, and the development of intuitive explanation strategies. Addressing these gaps can significantly improve the trustworthiness and effectiveness of AI systems across sectors.

Intelligent Systems with ApplicationsVol. 28
Ain Shams University (EG), British University in Dubai (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
12.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.