Comparison of the accuracy of six intraocular lens power calculation methods in post-myopic-LASIK eyes

Generally, ASCRS-Min, EVO 2.0, Pearl-DGS, and Barrett True-K no-history achieve relatively better accuracy than the other methods, which might be considered as first choices for IOL power calculation in post-myopic-LASIK eyes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Ophthalmology Practice and Research
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aopr.2025.10.005
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the accuracy of six intraocular lens power calculation methods in post-myopic-LASIK eyes

Kaiwen Cheng, Qingying Yang, Wenwen He, Jiaqi Meng et al.
Advances in Ophthalmology Practice and Research
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Comparison of the accuracy of six intraocular lens power calculation methods in post-myopic-LASIK eyes

Kaiwen Cheng, Qingying Yang, Wenwen He, Jiaqi Meng, Xiangjia Zhu
article en

Abstract

Generally, ASCRS-Min, EVO 2.0, Pearl-DGS, and Barrett True-K no-history achieve relatively better accuracy than the other methods, which might be considered as first choices for IOL power calculation in post-myopic-LASIK eyes.

Advances in Ophthalmology Practice and ResearchVol. 6(1)
Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.