Partisanship and Place: Education Preferences Across the Urban–Rural Divide

Research linking political polarization to spatial divides has largely overlooked policy preferences. This article argues that local conditions meaningfully moderate the relationship between party affiliation and people’s policy preferences. Focusing on public education in the United States, it contends that local realities can create contextual cross-pressures for partisans, especially Republicans, whose education needs may be at odds with the party agenda. In rural contexts, alternative schooling is limited and traditional public schools are essential institutions. Preferences should reflect these contextual pressures. Examining survey data for tax and spending preferences, findings suggest that while Republicans generally oppose increased education funding, rural Republicans, particularly in areas with limited school choice, are more supportive of public education taxes and spending than their urban counterparts. Shedding new light on party-voter congruence, the article shows how local policy realities reshape partisan divides, particularly in rural America, where partisan loyalty persists but policy alignment is more complex.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Studies
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217251382020
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partisanship and Place: Education Preferences Across the Urban–Rural Divide

Kattalina M. Berriochoa
Political Studies
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Partisanship and Place: Education Preferences Across the Urban–Rural Divide

Kattalina M. Berriochoa
article en

Abstract

Research linking political polarization to spatial divides has largely overlooked policy preferences. This article argues that local conditions meaningfully moderate the relationship between party affiliation and people’s policy preferences. Focusing on public education in the United States, it contends that local realities can create contextual cross-pressures for partisans, especially Republicans, whose education needs may be at odds with the party agenda. In rural contexts, alternative schooling is limited and traditional public schools are essential institutions. Preferences should reflect these contextual pressures. Examining survey data for tax and spending preferences, findings suggest that while Republicans generally oppose increased education funding, rural Republicans, particularly in areas with limited school choice, are more supportive of public education taxes and spending than their urban counterparts. Shedding new light on party-voter congruence, the article shows how local policy realities reshape partisan divides, particularly in rural America, where partisan loyalty persists but policy alignment is more complex.

Political Studies
University of Konstanz (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.