Proposal Writing Training and Idea Development for Early‐Career Researchers Based on Constructive Alignment, Co‐Creation and Active Learning Strategies

In today's research landscape, which is ever more dependent on external funding, early career researchers (ECRs) urgently need competence in idea development and proposal writing. However, generalized lectures provided by many higher education and research institutions lack practical elements such as hands-on skill training and support measures to coach the ECRs through the process of developing their own proposal. This limited support often leads to proposals of low quality, low success rates, and low motivation to engage further in proposal writing. To move away from this "learning-by-failure," we developed a novel concept for training in proposal writing, constructively aligning learning outcomes with students' needs, co-creating course content with teachers and students, and using active learning strategies. The main novelty of this concept lies in students iteratively and interactively developing their own research ideas into project proposals while learning how to write proposals. Over the past 10 years, we have successfully run this concept as a 2-day workshop and as a 5-month class for ECRs in climate sciences. Most of the proposals developed during our courses were submitted, and the application success rate of 15%-30% is well above the average for the targeted funding schemes. Participants whose proposals were rejected nevertheless appreciate the high learning outcome and the peer support and are motivated to revise and re-submit their proposals. We see that increasing numbers of our ECRs are eager to develop and submit their own research ideas, which, considering the high success rates, brings both scientific and economic benefits to our institutions. We hope other research and higher education institutions will adopt our course concept, allowing more ECRs to benefit from co-created proposal writing training which directly aligns learning outcomes with students' immediate needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.72162
Primary Topic
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proposal Writing Training and Idea Development for Early‐Career Researchers Based on Constructive Alignment, Co‐Creation and Active Learning Strategies

Catherine Downy, Friederike Hoffmann, Linling Chen, Nadine Goris et al.
Ecology and Evolution
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
article

Proposal Writing Training and Idea Development for Early‐Career Researchers Based on Constructive Alignment, Co‐Creation and Active Learning Strategies

Catherine Downy, Friederike Hoffmann, Linling Chen, Nadine Goris, Mahaut de Vareilles
article en

Abstract

In today's research landscape, which is ever more dependent on external funding, early career researchers (ECRs) urgently need competence in idea development and proposal writing. However, generalized lectures provided by many higher education and research institutions lack practical elements such as hands-on skill training and support measures to coach the ECRs through the process of developing their own proposal. This limited support often leads to proposals of low quality, low success rates, and low motivation to engage further in proposal writing. To move away from this "learning-by-failure," we developed a novel concept for training in proposal writing, constructively aligning learning outcomes with students' needs, co-creating course content with teachers and students, and using active learning strategies. The main novelty of this concept lies in students iteratively and interactively developing their own research ideas into project proposals while learning how to write proposals. Over the past 10 years, we have successfully run this concept as a 2-day workshop and as a 5-month class for ECRs in climate sciences. Most of the proposals developed during our courses were submitted, and the application success rate of 15%-30% is well above the average for the targeted funding schemes. Participants whose proposals were rejected nevertheless appreciate the high learning outcome and the peer support and are motivated to revise and re-submit their proposals. We see that increasing numbers of our ECRs are eager to develop and submit their own research ideas, which, considering the high success rates, brings both scientific and economic benefits to our institutions. We hope other research and higher education institutions will adopt our course concept, allowing more ECRs to benefit from co-created proposal writing training which directly aligns learning outcomes with students' immediate needs.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 15(10)
Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research (NO), NORCE Research AS (NO), Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center (NO), University of Bergen (NO)
National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, Norges Forskningsråd, Bjerknessenteret for klimaforskning, Universitetet i Bergen
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.