Expandable versus inflatable mediastinoscopic combined with laparoscopic for radical esophagectomy

EMLE has no disadvantages compared with IMLE. It is a radical resection of esophageal cancer with more advantages in surgical operation and blood loss control and is also worth promoting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-04004-9
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expandable versus inflatable mediastinoscopic combined with laparoscopic for radical esophagectomy

Kefeng Shi, Rulin Qian, Wei Li, Weidong Zhang et al.
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Expandable versus inflatable mediastinoscopic combined with laparoscopic for radical esophagectomy

Kefeng Shi, Rulin Qian, Wei Li, Weidong Zhang, Dong Cui, Ying Wu, Wentao Wu
article en

Abstract

EMLE has no disadvantages compared with IMLE. It is a radical resection of esophageal cancer with more advantages in surgical operation and blood loss control and is also worth promoting.

World Journal of Surgical OncologyVol. 23(1)
Zhengzhou University (CN), Henan Energy & Chemical Industry Group (China) (CN), Nanyang Institute of Technology (CN), Henan Provincial Chest Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.