Particle and front tracking in experimental and computational avalanche dynamics

Abstract. Understanding particle motion in snow avalanches is crucial for improving the representation of flow dynamics in numerical models. In this study, we develop and apply a general framework for testing and calibrating thickness-integrated flow models using in-flow sensor data from AvaNodes, radar measurements, and simulations with the com1DFA module of the open-source AvaFrame framework. This includes an implementation of particle tracking functionalities and focuses on assessing a modified Voellmy friction relation. Radar measurements of the avalanche front and three-dimensional AvaNode trajectories provide a comprehensive observational basis for model comparison. By minimizing the differences between measured and simulated velocities and front positions, we identify parameter sets that achieve high agreement with observed dynamics, yielding deviations below 5 %–10 % in maximum velocity and travel distance. However, the results reveal a trade-off between accurately reproducing particle vs. front behaviour, reflecting model limitations and the presence of equifinality in the parameter space. We also find that the simulated particle velocities are primarily controlled by initial position, contrasting with experimental observations that show more complex particle interactions. These findings underline the need for enhanced model formulations to better capture flow regime transitions and particle-scale effects. Our results highlight the potential of combining multiple measurement types for calibration and future improvements in avalanche modelling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural hazards and earth system sciences
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4185-2025
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Particle and front tracking in experimental and computational avalanche dynamics

Michael Neuhauser, Felix Oesterle, Wolfgang Fellin, Anselm Köhler et al.
Natural hazards and earth system sciences
Landslides and related hazards
article

Particle and front tracking in experimental and computational avalanche dynamics

Michael Neuhauser, Felix Oesterle, Wolfgang Fellin, Anselm Köhler, Falko Dressler, Johannes Gerstmayr, Anna Wirbel, Jan‐Thomas Fischer
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Understanding particle motion in snow avalanches is crucial for improving the representation of flow dynamics in numerical models. In this study, we develop and apply a general framework for testing and calibrating thickness-integrated flow models using in-flow sensor data from AvaNodes, radar measurements, and simulations with the com1DFA module of the open-source AvaFrame framework. This includes an implementation of particle tracking functionalities and focuses on assessing a modified Voellmy friction relation. Radar measurements of the avalanche front and three-dimensional AvaNode trajectories provide a comprehensive observational basis for model comparison. By minimizing the differences between measured and simulated velocities and front positions, we identify parameter sets that achieve high agreement with observed dynamics, yielding deviations below 5 %–10 % in maximum velocity and travel distance. However, the results reveal a trade-off between accurately reproducing particle vs. front behaviour, reflecting model limitations and the presence of equifinality in the parameter space. We also find that the simulated particle velocities are primarily controlled by initial position, contrasting with experimental observations that show more complex particle interactions. These findings underline the need for enhanced model formulations to better capture flow regime transitions and particle-scale effects. Our results highlight the potential of combining multiple measurement types for calibration and future improvements in avalanche modelling.

Natural hazards and earth system sciencesVol. 25(10)
Universität Innsbruck (AT), Austrian Research Centre for Forests (AT), Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Austrian Science Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Landslides and related hazards
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.