Considering dynamic landscape ecological risk to identify ecological security patterns in urban agglomeration

Identifying priority areas for conservation and developing strategies to minimize the potential risks arising from urban development is crucial to achieving ecosystem sustainability. The construction and maintenance of ecological security patterns are essential for ensuring regional ecological security, especially in rapidly expanding urban agglomerations. In this study, ecological security patterns were identified for the Changsha–Zhuzhou–Xiangtan (CZT) urban agglomeration, China. Ecological sources were selected by integrating ecosystem services and landscape ecological risk and ecological corridors were identified using the minimum cumulative resistance model. Our findings indicated that areas with high landscape ecological risk accounted for 33.09% of the total area, primarily concentrated in the northern and central-western plains. Approximately 45% of the CZT urban agglomeration provided a high level of ecosystem services; however, 16.6% of these areas were exposed to high landscape ecological risk. The ecological security patterns consisted of 58 ecological sources and 137 ecological corridors, and ecological sources were mainly distributed in the northeastern and southern parts of the study area and exhibited significant fragmentation in the western CZT urban agglomeration. The framework proposed in this study, which simultaneously considers dynamic landscape ecological risk and ecosystem services importance, provides an effective approach for identifying ecological security patterns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03091333251391061
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considering dynamic landscape ecological risk to identify ecological security patterns in urban agglomeration

Jian Peng, Xiaoyu Li, Hui Tang
Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Considering dynamic landscape ecological risk to identify ecological security patterns in urban agglomeration

Jian Peng, Xiaoyu Li, Hui Tang
article en

Abstract

Identifying priority areas for conservation and developing strategies to minimize the potential risks arising from urban development is crucial to achieving ecosystem sustainability. The construction and maintenance of ecological security patterns are essential for ensuring regional ecological security, especially in rapidly expanding urban agglomerations. In this study, ecological security patterns were identified for the Changsha–Zhuzhou–Xiangtan (CZT) urban agglomeration, China. Ecological sources were selected by integrating ecosystem services and landscape ecological risk and ecological corridors were identified using the minimum cumulative resistance model. Our findings indicated that areas with high landscape ecological risk accounted for 33.09% of the total area, primarily concentrated in the northern and central-western plains. Approximately 45% of the CZT urban agglomeration provided a high level of ecosystem services; however, 16.6% of these areas were exposed to high landscape ecological risk. The ecological security patterns consisted of 58 ecological sources and 137 ecological corridors, and ecological sources were mainly distributed in the northeastern and southern parts of the study area and exhibited significant fragmentation in the western CZT urban agglomeration. The framework proposed in this study, which simultaneously considers dynamic landscape ecological risk and ecosystem services importance, provides an effective approach for identifying ecological security patterns.

Progress in Physical Geography Earth and EnvironmentVol. 50(1)
Peking University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.