Status of European food ecolabels based on life cycle assessment: methodological challenges toward convergence

Ecolabels play a crucial role in achieving responsible production and consumption. Current LCA-based food ecolabels suffer from inconsistent methodologies, leading to significant variability in the estimated sustainability performance for the same product. To address the methodological challenges, we investigated 31 food ecolabels based on LCA from the EU countries, Norway, the UK, and Switzerland. Data were collected through questionnaires and systematically analysed. The analysis revealed significant heterogeneity in the methodologies behind the different food ecolabels, with variations in functional units, system boundaries, impact categories assessed, etc. Ecolabels exhibited a wide range of label formats regarding gradation type, score/value type, and impact category aggregation type, showcasing diverse approaches to communicating sustainability performance. The Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) and some PEF Category Rules (PEFCRs) are available for the LCA methodology used for the calculation, even though they need to be further tailored. However, no standards or guidelines are available for guiding the communication of LCA results with consumers in term of label formats at the EU level. Finally, the identified methodological challenges were discussed, emphasising the need for regulatory standards to address the diversity in ecolabeling practices and to guide the development of a more uniform and transparent framework for food ecolabels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.10.012
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Status of European food ecolabels based on life cycle assessment: methodological challenges toward convergence

Björn G. Andersen, Huayang Zhen, J.A. Boone, Vincent Colomb et al.
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Status of European food ecolabels based on life cycle assessment: methodological challenges toward convergence

Björn G. Andersen, Huayang Zhen, J.A. Boone, Vincent Colomb, Lisbeth Mogensen, Marie Trydeman Knudsen, Fatemeh Hashemi
article en

Abstract

Ecolabels play a crucial role in achieving responsible production and consumption. Current LCA-based food ecolabels suffer from inconsistent methodologies, leading to significant variability in the estimated sustainability performance for the same product. To address the methodological challenges, we investigated 31 food ecolabels based on LCA from the EU countries, Norway, the UK, and Switzerland. Data were collected through questionnaires and systematically analysed. The analysis revealed significant heterogeneity in the methodologies behind the different food ecolabels, with variations in functional units, system boundaries, impact categories assessed, etc. Ecolabels exhibited a wide range of label formats regarding gradation type, score/value type, and impact category aggregation type, showcasing diverse approaches to communicating sustainability performance. The Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) and some PEF Category Rules (PEFCRs) are available for the LCA methodology used for the calculation, even though they need to be further tailored. However, no standards or guidelines are available for guiding the communication of LCA results with consumers in term of label formats at the EU level. Finally, the identified methodological challenges were discussed, emphasising the need for regulatory standards to address the diversity in ecolabeling practices and to guide the development of a more uniform and transparent framework for food ecolabels.

Sustainable Production and ConsumptionVol. 61
Aarhus University (DK), Agence de la transition écologique (FR), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.