Children's environmental subjective well-being: Considering the intersecting role of nature, inequalities, and community

Children's engagement with nature enhances their well-being at both individual and community levels, yet systemic inequalities within local contexts shape children's access, proximity, quality, and safety in natural spaces. Research shows that children's understandings of nature and community are formed through their access to these spaces during their formative years. This article examines environmental subjective well-being (ESWB), an emerging interdisciplinary focus that captures the benefits of children's interactions with the natural environment and their influence on subjective well-being from a child-centred perspective. Understanding ESWB requires a nuanced contextualisation of place and inequality. We synthesise current evidence on children's engagement with nature in community settings and identify priorities for future research. We position children's engagement with nature as a social justice and children's rights imperative, with implications for policy and practice globally, particularly for the Global South.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Psychology
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102200
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Children's environmental subjective well-being: Considering the intersecting role of nature, inequalities, and community

Susann Fegter, Daniel Stoecklin, Ravinder Barn, Sabirah Adams et al.
Current Opinion in Psychology
Environmental Education and Sustainability
article

Children's environmental subjective well-being: Considering the intersecting role of nature, inequalities, and community

Susann Fegter, Daniel Stoecklin, Ravinder Barn, Sabirah Adams, Tobia Fattore, Ferrán Casas, Shazly Savahl, Maria van der Harst
article en

Abstract

Children's engagement with nature enhances their well-being at both individual and community levels, yet systemic inequalities within local contexts shape children's access, proximity, quality, and safety in natural spaces. Research shows that children's understandings of nature and community are formed through their access to these spaces during their formative years. This article examines environmental subjective well-being (ESWB), an emerging interdisciplinary focus that captures the benefits of children's interactions with the natural environment and their influence on subjective well-being from a child-centred perspective. Understanding ESWB requires a nuanced contextualisation of place and inequality. We synthesise current evidence on children's engagement with nature in community settings and identify priorities for future research. We position children's engagement with nature as a social justice and children's rights imperative, with implications for policy and practice globally, particularly for the Global South.

Current Opinion in PsychologyVol. 67
University of Geneva (CH), University of South Africa (ZA), Royal Holloway University of London (GB), Universitat de Girona (ES), Netherlands Youth Institute (NL), Centre for Higher Education (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Children's environmental subjective well-being: Considering the intersecting role of nature, inequalities, and community — Susann Fegter, Daniel Stoecklin, et al. · Current Opinion in Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS