Accuracy and Precision of Model-Based Tracking of a Dynamic Hop Landing Activity

Biplane videoradiography (BVR) is the preferred 3D imaging modality for investigating the relationship between sub-millimeter knee kinematic abnormalities and posttraumatic osteoarthritis risk following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and surgery. Activity-specific BVR system geometries maximize BVR's limited field of view which, in turn, influences downstream accuracy. The present work aimed to quantify the accuracy, bias, and precision of the reconstructed 3D tibiofemoral kinematics within a BVR system configured to capture the landing phase of a one-leg hop-for-distance activity. Radio-opaque beads were implanted into the femurs and tibiae of three cadaveric knees to provide the gold-standard kinematics. The specimens were moved through the BVR field of view simulating hop and drop landing motions such that the motion trajectories could better approximate dynamic in vivo velocities. The motions were tracked using both marker- and model-based methods. The mean absolute difference in kinematics between the two tracking methods was used to describe accuracy. Bland-Altman tests were used to quantify bias and precision. Kinematic accuracy ranged from 0.30 to 0.39° for rotations and from 0.34 to 0.50 mm for translations. The magnitudes of absolute difference, bias, and precision were similar regardless of the amount of soft tissue present or velocity of the simulated movement. Our results indicate that our approach for capturing BVR-derived kinematics for a one-leg hop-for-distance is sufficiently accurate to capture the magnitude of differences we expect to observe in a clinical population of ACL-reconstructed patients at long-term follow-up and will be useful to other investigators who may wish to record the hop-for-distance activity using the system geometry and image capture settings described here.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12111168
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy and Precision of Model-Based Tracking of a Dynamic Hop Landing Activity

Dominique A. Barnes, Braden C. Fleming, Jillian E. Beveridge, Christine Murray et al.
Bioengineering
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Accuracy and Precision of Model-Based Tracking of a Dynamic Hop Landing Activity

Dominique A. Barnes, Braden C. Fleming, Jillian E. Beveridge, Christine Murray, John D. Holtgrewe
article en

Abstract

Biplane videoradiography (BVR) is the preferred 3D imaging modality for investigating the relationship between sub-millimeter knee kinematic abnormalities and posttraumatic osteoarthritis risk following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and surgery. Activity-specific BVR system geometries maximize BVR's limited field of view which, in turn, influences downstream accuracy. The present work aimed to quantify the accuracy, bias, and precision of the reconstructed 3D tibiofemoral kinematics within a BVR system configured to capture the landing phase of a one-leg hop-for-distance activity. Radio-opaque beads were implanted into the femurs and tibiae of three cadaveric knees to provide the gold-standard kinematics. The specimens were moved through the BVR field of view simulating hop and drop landing motions such that the motion trajectories could better approximate dynamic in vivo velocities. The motions were tracked using both marker- and model-based methods. The mean absolute difference in kinematics between the two tracking methods was used to describe accuracy. Bland-Altman tests were used to quantify bias and precision. Kinematic accuracy ranged from 0.30 to 0.39° for rotations and from 0.34 to 0.50 mm for translations. The magnitudes of absolute difference, bias, and precision were similar regardless of the amount of soft tissue present or velocity of the simulated movement. Our results indicate that our approach for capturing BVR-derived kinematics for a one-leg hop-for-distance is sufficiently accurate to capture the magnitude of differences we expect to observe in a clinical population of ACL-reconstructed patients at long-term follow-up and will be useful to other investigators who may wish to record the hop-for-distance activity using the system geometry and image capture settings described here.

BioengineeringVol. 12(11)
Brown University (US)
W. M. Keck Foundation, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.