Aortic root replacement after repaired congenital conotruncal defects: A surgical challenge

Background: Aortic root replacement (ARR) for patients with repaired conotruncal defects is challenging.We report outcomes of ARR in this complex patient population.Methods: After querying 2710 ARR cases at 2 academic centers between 2004 and 2021, 18 patients (0.7%) with previously repaired conotruncal defects were identified.These included 10 patients with tetralogy of Fallot, 4 with transposition, 2 with double-outlet right ventricle, 1 with truncus arteriosus, and 1 with single ventricle with pulmonary atresia.Surgical history, baseline characteristics, hospital courses, and outcomes were reviewed from the medical records.Survival probability was estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results:The patients ranged in age from 15 years to 68 years, and 2 (11.1%) were female.Mean root diameter was 54 13 mm.The indication for ARR was aneurysm with aortic insufficiency in 12 patients (66.7%), aneurysm alone in 5 (27.8%), and pseudoaneurysm in 1 (5.7%).Nine patients (50%) had 1 previous sternotomy, 6 (33%) had 2 previous sternotomies, and 3 (16.7%)had 3 or more previous sternotomies.A valve-sparing operation might have been possible in 12 patients but ultimately was performed in 3 (16.7%).Concomitant procedures included pulmonary valve replacement (n = 7; 38.9%), coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 3; 16.7%), and tricuspid (n = 1) and mitral (n = 1) valve repairs.Mean bypass and cross-clamp times were 245 77 minutes and 174 74 minutes, respectively.There were 3 in-hospital deaths from stroke and multiorgan failure.The 5-year survival probability was 76.2% (95% confidence interval, 58.2%-99.7%). Conclusions:The development of aortic root pathology requiring ARR following repaired conotruncal defects occurs infrequently.Valve-sparing operations are rarely performed or even possible.Given the significant mortality, careful consideration should be given to performing ARR in this complex patient population.(JTCVS

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JTCVS Open
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2025.10.016
Primary Topic
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aortic root replacement after repaired congenital conotruncal defects: A surgical challenge

Andrew B. Goldstone, Kavya Rajesh, Megan M. Chung, Edward P. Chen et al.
JTCVS Open
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
article

Aortic root replacement after repaired congenital conotruncal defects: A surgical challenge

Andrew B. Goldstone, Kavya Rajesh, Megan M. Chung, Edward P. Chen, Hiroo Takayama, Alexander P. Nissen, Elizabeth L. Norton, Yu Hohri, Paridhi Agarwal, Chris He
article en

Abstract

Background: Aortic root replacement (ARR) for patients with repaired conotruncal defects is challenging.We report outcomes of ARR in this complex patient population.Methods: After querying 2710 ARR cases at 2 academic centers between 2004 and 2021, 18 patients (0.7%) with previously repaired conotruncal defects were identified.These included 10 patients with tetralogy of Fallot, 4 with transposition, 2 with double-outlet right ventricle, 1 with truncus arteriosus, and 1 with single ventricle with pulmonary atresia.Surgical history, baseline characteristics, hospital courses, and outcomes were reviewed from the medical records.Survival probability was estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results:The patients ranged in age from 15 years to 68 years, and 2 (11.1%) were female.Mean root diameter was 54 13 mm.The indication for ARR was aneurysm with aortic insufficiency in 12 patients (66.7%), aneurysm alone in 5 (27.8%), and pseudoaneurysm in 1 (5.7%).Nine patients (50%) had 1 previous sternotomy, 6 (33%) had 2 previous sternotomies, and 3 (16.7%)had 3 or more previous sternotomies.A valve-sparing operation might have been possible in 12 patients but ultimately was performed in 3 (16.7%).Concomitant procedures included pulmonary valve replacement (n = 7; 38.9%), coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 3; 16.7%), and tricuspid (n = 1) and mitral (n = 1) valve repairs.Mean bypass and cross-clamp times were 245 77 minutes and 174 74 minutes, respectively.There were 3 in-hospital deaths from stroke and multiorgan failure.The 5-year survival probability was 76.2% (95% confidence interval, 58.2%-99.7%). Conclusions:The development of aortic root pathology requiring ARR following repaired conotruncal defects occurs infrequently.Valve-sparing operations are rarely performed or even possible.Given the significant mortality, careful consideration should be given to performing ARR in this complex patient population.(JTCVS

JTCVS OpenVol. 29
Emory University (US), Duke University (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.