From Fault to Remedy: A Case for a Holistic Approach to Remedy within Business and Human Rights

ABSTRACT: Business and Human Rights is predicated on the idea that victims of a corporate human rights violation should have access to an effective remedy. What constitutes a remedy, and how to access it has been the source of much debate and research both within the field and beyond. Most recently, there is a drive towards holding corporations legally liable through ever increasing turns to mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence. Whereas this offers much, we worry at what cost. Specifically, we argue that this is an imperfect outworking of a flawed system built on the outdated idea that corporations could only be responsible for their legal liabilities. Instead, we urge a commitment to continued dialogue, to participation, to negotiations and discussions with all stakeholders in business operations that the origins of due diligence promised. As such, we propose that extra-legal remedies can be a constructive way forward in redressing corporate human rights violations that can encourage better compliance with legal norms.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Rights Quarterly
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2025.a972479
Primary Topic
Corporate Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Fault to Remedy: A Case for a Holistic Approach to Remedy within Business and Human Rights

Luke Moffett, Ciara Hackett
Human Rights Quarterly
Corporate Law and Human Rights
article

From Fault to Remedy: A Case for a Holistic Approach to Remedy within Business and Human Rights

Luke Moffett, Ciara Hackett
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Business and Human Rights is predicated on the idea that victims of a corporate human rights violation should have access to an effective remedy. What constitutes a remedy, and how to access it has been the source of much debate and research both within the field and beyond. Most recently, there is a drive towards holding corporations legally liable through ever increasing turns to mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence. Whereas this offers much, we worry at what cost. Specifically, we argue that this is an imperfect outworking of a flawed system built on the outdated idea that corporations could only be responsible for their legal liabilities. Instead, we urge a commitment to continued dialogue, to participation, to negotiations and discussions with all stakeholders in business operations that the origins of due diligence promised. As such, we propose that extra-legal remedies can be a constructive way forward in redressing corporate human rights violations that can encourage better compliance with legal norms.

Human Rights QuarterlyVol. 47(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Corporate Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.