Reliability and Repeatability of the Low-Cost G-Force Load Cell System in Isometric Hip Abduction and Adduction Tests: A Pilot Study

Background/Objectives: Low-cost portable load cell dynamometers allow for real-time assessment of muscular strength. This study evaluated the reliability and repeatability of the G-Force load cell system during isometric hip abduction and adduction in young physically active Chilean adults. Methods: In total, 24 participants (19 men, 5 women) performed two maximal voluntary contractions per movement, repeated after a 24 h interval. Measured variables included Peak Force, peak rate of force development (Peak RFD), RFD at 50, 100, and 200 ms (RFD50, RFD100, RFD200), and maximum jerk. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard error of measurement (SEM), coefficient of variation (CV%) and Bland–Altman plots. Results: Peak Force showed excellent within-day (ICC = 0.94–0.96) and high between-day reliability (ICC = 0.87–0.89; CV = 20–30%). Bland–Altman analysis indicated negligible bias for Peak Force in abduction (−6.54 N; 95% CI −19.55 to 6.47) and adduction (−17.57 N; 95% CI −37.24 to 2.09), confirming the absence of systematic error. Peak RFD, RFD50–200, and maximum Jerk showed moderate repeatability and lower between-day reliability (ICCs = 0.39–0.70; CVs = 34–57%), indicating higher variability in explosive force indices compared with maximal strength. Conclusions: The G-Force load cell reliably measures maximal isometric hip strength, while Peak RFD, RFD50–200, and maximum jerk should be interpreted cautiously. These findings support the device as a practical, low-cost tool for sports and rehabilitation, though future studies should validate dynamic indices in larger and more diverse populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152111457
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability and Repeatability of the Low-Cost G-Force Load Cell System in Isometric Hip Abduction and Adduction Tests: A Pilot Study

Héctor Fuentes-Barría, Ángel Roco-Videla, Marcela Caviedes-Olmos, Diana Rojas-Gómez et al.
2 citations
Applied Sciences
Sports injuries and prevention
3.44
article

Reliability and Repeatability of the Low-Cost G-Force Load Cell System in Isometric Hip Abduction and Adduction Tests: A Pilot Study

Héctor Fuentes-Barría, Ángel Roco-Videla, Marcela Caviedes-Olmos, Diana Rojas-Gómez, Raul Alberto Aguilera-Eguía, Víctor Garrido-Osorio, Sebastián Sanhueza-González, Catarí Sandoval-Jelves
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Low-cost portable load cell dynamometers allow for real-time assessment of muscular strength. This study evaluated the reliability and repeatability of the G-Force load cell system during isometric hip abduction and adduction in young physically active Chilean adults. Methods: In total, 24 participants (19 men, 5 women) performed two maximal voluntary contractions per movement, repeated after a 24 h interval. Measured variables included Peak Force, peak rate of force development (Peak RFD), RFD at 50, 100, and 200 ms (RFD50, RFD100, RFD200), and maximum jerk. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard error of measurement (SEM), coefficient of variation (CV%) and Bland–Altman plots. Results: Peak Force showed excellent within-day (ICC = 0.94–0.96) and high between-day reliability (ICC = 0.87–0.89; CV = 20–30%). Bland–Altman analysis indicated negligible bias for Peak Force in abduction (−6.54 N; 95% CI −19.55 to 6.47) and adduction (−17.57 N; 95% CI −37.24 to 2.09), confirming the absence of systematic error. Peak RFD, RFD50–200, and maximum Jerk showed moderate repeatability and lower between-day reliability (ICCs = 0.39–0.70; CVs = 34–57%), indicating higher variability in explosive force indices compared with maximal strength. Conclusions: The G-Force load cell reliably measures maximal isometric hip strength, while Peak RFD, RFD50–200, and maximum jerk should be interpreted cautiously. These findings support the device as a practical, low-cost tool for sports and rehabilitation, though future studies should validate dynamic indices in larger and more diverse populations.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(21)
University of Concepción (CL), Universidad Autónoma de Chile (CL), San Sebastián University (CL), Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción (CL), University of the Americas (CL), Universidad Andrés Bello (CL), Universidad Santo Tomás (CL), Arturo Prat University (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sports injuries and prevention
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.