MACHINE LEARNING FOR STRATEGIC AND OPERATIONAL DECISION-MAKING: A BIBLIOMETRIC PERSPECTIVE

<p>Besides being a buzzword, machine learning finds new areas of application in organizational decision-making processes by the day. We map the field's intellectual structure, thematic evolution, and application domains through a bibliometric analysis of 1,803 Web of Science and Scopus articles (1990-2024) to elucidate its strategic and operational roles. Six clusters, spanning risk modeling, predictive analytics, strategic intelligence, and human-centered AI, are revealed by co-authorship, keyword co-occurrence, and bibliographic coupling. The findings reveal a fragmented but methodologically diverse landscape, with algorithm adoption differing by decision type and industry. By connecting machine learning methods (like deep learning, natural language processing, and explainable AI) with decision functions (like forecasting, optimization, and classification), we can identify the situations in which machine learning has the biggest influence. We go beyond descriptive enumeration with our integration of conceptual and practical insights.</p>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
BH Ekonomski forum
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62900/bhef252101005
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MACHINE LEARNING FOR STRATEGIC AND OPERATIONAL DECISION-MAKING: A BIBLIOMETRIC PERSPECTIVE

Bojan Kitanovikj, Filip Peovski, Ivona Serafimovska
BH Ekonomski forum
Big Data and Business Intelligence
article

MACHINE LEARNING FOR STRATEGIC AND OPERATIONAL DECISION-MAKING: A BIBLIOMETRIC PERSPECTIVE

Bojan Kitanovikj, Filip Peovski, Ivona Serafimovska
article en

Abstract

<p>Besides being a buzzword, machine learning finds new areas of application in organizational decision-making processes by the day. We map the field's intellectual structure, thematic evolution, and application domains through a bibliometric analysis of 1,803 Web of Science and Scopus articles (1990-2024) to elucidate its strategic and operational roles. Six clusters, spanning risk modeling, predictive analytics, strategic intelligence, and human-centered AI, are revealed by co-authorship, keyword co-occurrence, and bibliographic coupling. The findings reveal a fragmented but methodologically diverse landscape, with algorithm adoption differing by decision type and industry. By connecting machine learning methods (like deep learning, natural language processing, and explainable AI) with decision functions (like forecasting, optimization, and classification), we can identify the situations in which machine learning has the biggest influence. We go beyond descriptive enumeration with our integration of conceptual and practical insights.</p>

BH Ekonomski forumVol. 1(21)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

MACHINE LEARNING FOR STRATEGIC AND OPERATIONAL DECISION-MAKING: A BIBLIOMETRIC PERSPECTIVE — Bojan Kitanovikj, Filip Peovski, et al. · BH Ekonomski forum (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS