Comparative Study of Cross-System Microseismic Energy Calculation and Fusion Methods—A Case Study

Microseismic monitoring technology serves as a vital tool for assessing the stability of coal and rock masses. The precision of energy calculations and the ability to integrate data across different systems have a direct impact on the effectiveness of early warning systems for hazards such as rockburst. This study utilized the 6306 working face of Shandong Energy Group’s Dongtan Coal Mine as its experimental site to address data inconsistencies caused by variations in sensor responses, localization algorithms, and energy calculation methods among microseismic monitoring systems. Two microseismic monitoring platforms, designated as System A and System B, were deployed to conduct a comparative and integrative study of cross-system energy calculations. The optimization of sensor layout facilitated a comprehensive analysis of the differences between the two systems in terms of P-wave arrival times, amplitude–frequency characteristics, and localization accuracy. Results indicated that System A achieved significantly lower localization errors, with an average of 49 m, compared to System B’s average of 70 m. Substantial differences were also found in waveform amplitude and dominant frequency, with a correlation coefficient of only 0.59 between the two systems. To bridge these disparities, an energy calculation method based on the displacement gauge function was developed. By fitting a localized gauge function R(Δ) and incorporating empirical coefficients, the energy calculation outputs of both systems were harmonized. Validation experiments demonstrated that the linear correlation coefficient of energy calculations between Systems A and B increased to 0.977 under the new method, confirming its effectiveness for data unification. This research provides critical theoretical and technical guidance for integrating microseismic data across systems and establishing unified early warning standards, thus advancing the monitoring and prediction of dynamic hazards in mining environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152111488
Primary Topic
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Cross-System Microseismic Energy Calculation and Fusion Methods—A Case Study

Xianyang Yan, Hang Sun, Quan Zhang, Chao Wang et al.
Applied Sciences
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
article

Comparative Study of Cross-System Microseismic Energy Calculation and Fusion Methods—A Case Study

Xianyang Yan, Hang Sun, Quan Zhang, Chao Wang, Haichen Yin, Renbo Yu, Xiufeng Zhang, Siyuan Gong
article en

Abstract

Microseismic monitoring technology serves as a vital tool for assessing the stability of coal and rock masses. The precision of energy calculations and the ability to integrate data across different systems have a direct impact on the effectiveness of early warning systems for hazards such as rockburst. This study utilized the 6306 working face of Shandong Energy Group’s Dongtan Coal Mine as its experimental site to address data inconsistencies caused by variations in sensor responses, localization algorithms, and energy calculation methods among microseismic monitoring systems. Two microseismic monitoring platforms, designated as System A and System B, were deployed to conduct a comparative and integrative study of cross-system energy calculations. The optimization of sensor layout facilitated a comprehensive analysis of the differences between the two systems in terms of P-wave arrival times, amplitude–frequency characteristics, and localization accuracy. Results indicated that System A achieved significantly lower localization errors, with an average of 49 m, compared to System B’s average of 70 m. Substantial differences were also found in waveform amplitude and dominant frequency, with a correlation coefficient of only 0.59 between the two systems. To bridge these disparities, an energy calculation method based on the displacement gauge function was developed. By fitting a localized gauge function R(Δ) and incorporating empirical coefficients, the energy calculation outputs of both systems were harmonized. Validation experiments demonstrated that the linear correlation coefficient of energy calculations between Systems A and B increased to 0.977 under the new method, confirming its effectiveness for data unification. This research provides critical theoretical and technical guidance for integrating microseismic data across systems and establishing unified early warning standards, thus advancing the monitoring and prediction of dynamic hazards in mining environments.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(21)
China University of Mining and Technology (CN), Yankuang Energy Group Company Limited (China)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.