What Is a Woman? Applying Thomistic Principles to the Case of Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome

Even in extremely conservative circles, the question “What is a Woman?” is controversial when one examines the case of persons with Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (CAIS), wherein the person has XY chromosomes and testes, but due to a total inability to respond to testosterone, the person develops in all ways in a feminine fashion (the person will also be infertile). Some Thomist scholars have argued that these people might be sexless, or that we cannot determine what sex they are, or that they are women. Using Thomistic principles of human sexuality, teleology, hylomorphism and the conclusions of biology, I will argue that these persons are ontologically male, albeit with a severe disorder of sexual development (DSD). Thus, these persons are not eligible for Catholic marriage. Then, I will suggest that these men (who have the bodily and psychological features of women) should live as women in society, thus proposing an authentically Thomistic “trans-genderism” which differs totally from the ordinary use of the term.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16111361
Primary Topic
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Is a Woman? Applying Thomistic Principles to the Case of Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome

Matthew McKenna
Religions
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
article

What Is a Woman? Applying Thomistic Principles to the Case of Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome

Matthew McKenna
article en

Abstract

Even in extremely conservative circles, the question “What is a Woman?” is controversial when one examines the case of persons with Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (CAIS), wherein the person has XY chromosomes and testes, but due to a total inability to respond to testosterone, the person develops in all ways in a feminine fashion (the person will also be infertile). Some Thomist scholars have argued that these people might be sexless, or that we cannot determine what sex they are, or that they are women. Using Thomistic principles of human sexuality, teleology, hylomorphism and the conclusions of biology, I will argue that these persons are ontologically male, albeit with a severe disorder of sexual development (DSD). Thus, these persons are not eligible for Catholic marriage. Then, I will suggest that these men (who have the bodily and psychological features of women) should live as women in society, thus proposing an authentically Thomistic “trans-genderism” which differs totally from the ordinary use of the term.

ReligionsVol. 16(11)
Ave Maria University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.