Assessment of DNA Transfer on Drug Packages in Simulated Vehicular and Household Settings

<b>Background</b>: DNA evidence can play a critical role during the investigation of illicit drugs cases. A key challenge, however, is in determining whether DNA profiles recovered on the evidence items, such as drug packages, arise from direct handling or indirect transfer. <b>Methods</b>: In this respect, we simulated common drug offense scenarios where illicit drugs were discovered inside vehicular or household settings that can be linked to the suspect. DNA transfer was evaluated based on two hypothetical propositions: (1) the individual's DNA was directly deposited onto the mock drug packages through handling, or alternatively (2) DNA persisting on a particular surface had transferred onto the packages. For the direct transfer scenario, 15 participants were requested to pack the mock drug packages using their bare hands. For the indirect transfer scenario, DNA-free mock drug packages were placed at various locations in 15 vehicles and 15 bedrooms for different time intervals. Following each scenario, DNA samples were collected from multiple areas of the mock drug packages. DNA transfer was assessed based on quantification and profiling results, which were subsequently evaluated within a Bayesian network-based framework. <b>Results</b>: Higher DNA transfer frequencies onto the mock drug packages were observed in the direct-handling experiment compared to those from indirect transfer, suggesting that DNA transfer occurs to a higher degree from active contact. In direct-handling scenarios, the amount of DNA recovered from the handles of the carrier bags was much higher than that from the exterior bodies, indicating preferential DNA deposition at the contact areas. Conversely, the results from indirect transfer scenarios showed similar recovered DNA amounts between the handles and the exterior bodies of the carrier bags, with minimal transfer to the interior surfaces. These findings indicate that the likelihood of recovering DNA from specific areas of evidence items can be linked to the particular activities and transfer mechanisms involved. <b>Conclusions</b>: The findings of this study expand the empirical knowledge of DNA transfer processes across diverse forensic contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genes
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16111264
Primary Topic
Forensic and Genetic Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of DNA Transfer on Drug Packages in Simulated Vehicular and Household Settings

Nurul Insyirah Binte Ishak, Yong Sheng Lee, Marlene Abdul Mugni, Christopher Kiu‐Choong Syn et al.
Genes
Forensic and Genetic Research
article

Assessment of DNA Transfer on Drug Packages in Simulated Vehicular and Household Settings

Nurul Insyirah Binte Ishak, Yong Sheng Lee, Marlene Abdul Mugni, Christopher Kiu‐Choong Syn, Xiaoyang Li, Hee Kyung Yeo, Nadira Binte Murad, Sabrina Binte Mustaffa, Nurulain Haziqah Binte Ngatimin
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: DNA evidence can play a critical role during the investigation of illicit drugs cases. A key challenge, however, is in determining whether DNA profiles recovered on the evidence items, such as drug packages, arise from direct handling or indirect transfer. <b>Methods</b>: In this respect, we simulated common drug offense scenarios where illicit drugs were discovered inside vehicular or household settings that can be linked to the suspect. DNA transfer was evaluated based on two hypothetical propositions: (1) the individual's DNA was directly deposited onto the mock drug packages through handling, or alternatively (2) DNA persisting on a particular surface had transferred onto the packages. For the direct transfer scenario, 15 participants were requested to pack the mock drug packages using their bare hands. For the indirect transfer scenario, DNA-free mock drug packages were placed at various locations in 15 vehicles and 15 bedrooms for different time intervals. Following each scenario, DNA samples were collected from multiple areas of the mock drug packages. DNA transfer was assessed based on quantification and profiling results, which were subsequently evaluated within a Bayesian network-based framework. <b>Results</b>: Higher DNA transfer frequencies onto the mock drug packages were observed in the direct-handling experiment compared to those from indirect transfer, suggesting that DNA transfer occurs to a higher degree from active contact. In direct-handling scenarios, the amount of DNA recovered from the handles of the carrier bags was much higher than that from the exterior bodies, indicating preferential DNA deposition at the contact areas. Conversely, the results from indirect transfer scenarios showed similar recovered DNA amounts between the handles and the exterior bodies of the carrier bags, with minimal transfer to the interior surfaces. These findings indicate that the likelihood of recovering DNA from specific areas of evidence items can be linked to the particular activities and transfer mechanisms involved. <b>Conclusions</b>: The findings of this study expand the empirical knowledge of DNA transfer processes across diverse forensic contexts.

GenesVol. 16(11)
Health Sciences Authority (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Forensic and Genetic Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.