Deep learning-assisted CBCT segmentation provides reliable volumetric assessment of mandibular defects compared with micro-CT for 3D printing and surgical planning

Accurate volumetric assessment of intraosseous lesions is crucial in various fields, including bone defect evaluation, surgical outcome prediction, treatment monitoring, and 3D model design. High volumetric accuracy is essential for CBCT in digital dentistry applications. However, there is a notable lack of studies investigating the accuracy of volume determination using CBCT. In this study, we examined the factors affecting CBCT volumetric accuracy, namely voxel size, lesion location, and segmentation techniques, to improve diagnostic protocols and optimize the clinical applications of this imaging modality. 28 artificial bone defects were created in the dry rabbit mandible in two regions (Anterior and Posterior). CBCT imaging was performed with standardized positioning at two voxel sizes (0.1 and 0.2 mm). regarding micro-CT imaging as the gold standard. Images were analyzed in DICOM format using ImageJ after preprocessing, and semi-automatic segmentation was conducted via Otsu thresholding with a manually defined external defect border. In Avizo, a ResNet18-encoded U-Net architecture (Avizo's Backboned U-Net implementation) was trained for the multiclass segmentation of the bone, background, and lesions. The volume calculations were based on the voxel counts. Volumetric measurements from CBCT showed no statistically significant difference from the micro-CT gold standard (p > 0.05). However, a significant underestimation of volume was observed when using a larger voxel size (0.2 mm) compared with a smaller voxel size (0.1 mm), irrespective of the segmentation software used (p < 0.05). The choice of software (ImageJ vs. Avizo's deep learning-assisted tool) did not significantly affect the measurements of the porosity. The location of the defect (anterior vs. posterior) also had no significant impact on the accuracy. CBCT is a reliable tool for the volumetric assessment of mandibular bone defects and demonstrates strong agreement with micro-CT. Clinically, our findings suggest that selecting a smaller voxel size (0.1 mm) is paramount for maximizing measurement accuracy in applications requiring high precision, such as surgical planning and 3D model fabrication. The implementation of a deep learning-assisted segmentation model proved to be a viable and efficient alternative to conventional semi-automatic methods, highlighting its potential to streamline the digital workflow in dentistry without compromising accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-24748-4
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep learning-assisted CBCT segmentation provides reliable volumetric assessment of mandibular defects compared with micro-CT for 3D printing and surgical planning

Sina Haghanifar, Emadoddin Moudi, Ali Bijani, Mohsen Shalalvand
Scientific Reports
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Deep learning-assisted CBCT segmentation provides reliable volumetric assessment of mandibular defects compared with micro-CT for 3D printing and surgical planning

Sina Haghanifar, Emadoddin Moudi, Ali Bijani, Mohsen Shalalvand
article en

Abstract

Accurate volumetric assessment of intraosseous lesions is crucial in various fields, including bone defect evaluation, surgical outcome prediction, treatment monitoring, and 3D model design. High volumetric accuracy is essential for CBCT in digital dentistry applications. However, there is a notable lack of studies investigating the accuracy of volume determination using CBCT. In this study, we examined the factors affecting CBCT volumetric accuracy, namely voxel size, lesion location, and segmentation techniques, to improve diagnostic protocols and optimize the clinical applications of this imaging modality. 28 artificial bone defects were created in the dry rabbit mandible in two regions (Anterior and Posterior). CBCT imaging was performed with standardized positioning at two voxel sizes (0.1 and 0.2 mm). regarding micro-CT imaging as the gold standard. Images were analyzed in DICOM format using ImageJ after preprocessing, and semi-automatic segmentation was conducted via Otsu thresholding with a manually defined external defect border. In Avizo, a ResNet18-encoded U-Net architecture (Avizo's Backboned U-Net implementation) was trained for the multiclass segmentation of the bone, background, and lesions. The volume calculations were based on the voxel counts. Volumetric measurements from CBCT showed no statistically significant difference from the micro-CT gold standard (p > 0.05). However, a significant underestimation of volume was observed when using a larger voxel size (0.2 mm) compared with a smaller voxel size (0.1 mm), irrespective of the segmentation software used (p < 0.05). The choice of software (ImageJ vs. Avizo's deep learning-assisted tool) did not significantly affect the measurements of the porosity. The location of the defect (anterior vs. posterior) also had no significant impact on the accuracy. CBCT is a reliable tool for the volumetric assessment of mandibular bone defects and demonstrates strong agreement with micro-CT. Clinically, our findings suggest that selecting a smaller voxel size (0.1 mm) is paramount for maximizing measurement accuracy in applications requiring high precision, such as surgical planning and 3D model fabrication. The implementation of a deep learning-assisted segmentation model proved to be a viable and efficient alternative to conventional semi-automatic methods, highlighting its potential to streamline the digital workflow in dentistry without compromising accuracy.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Babol University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.