Split-mouth clinical trial evaluating pain perception in orthodontic patients using four types of separators: An <i>in viv</i> o study

Objectives: The objectives needs to include the study aims to evaluate the pain associated with four different types of separators at 4 hours, 24 hours, and on the 5 th day, and to compare the pain levels among the four types. Materials and Methods: Four different types of separators were placed in each quadrant of 54 patients receiving fixed orthodontic treatment, and each quadrant was divided into four groups. In group I, kesling separators were placed, while groups II, III, and IV were given elastomeric, brass wire, and kansal separators, respectively. Pain perception was evaluated after 4 hours, 24 hours, and on the 5 th day using the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS). The NPRS is a 0–10 scale where patients verbally rate their pain, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain. Results: Kansal separators consistently produced the highest pain scores across all time intervals, while kesling separators resulted in the least discomfort. At 4 hours post-placement, the highest mean pain score was observed in the kansal group (7.52 ± 1.57) and the lowest in the kesling group (6.69 ± 1.31), with a statistically significant difference ( P = 0.028). At 24 hours, pain remained highest for kansal separators (7.24 ± 1.63), though the differences were not statistically significant ( P = 0.152). By the 5 th day, overall pain levels had decreased, but kansal separators still recorded the highest pain (6.91 ± 1.54), while kesling recorded the lowest (6.00 ± 1.08), showing a significant difference ( P = 0.012). Conclusion: The type of separator has a significant impact on pain perception. Rigid separators, such as kansal and brass wire, induced higher pain, especially in the initial hours, while flexible separators, such as kesling, caused minimal discomfort. kesling separators may be preferred in patients with low pain tolerance to improve comfort and compliance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Oral Health and Allied Sciences
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/ajohas_17_2025
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Split-mouth clinical trial evaluating pain perception in orthodontic patients using four types of separators: An in viv o study

Thiruthara Pappu Baburaj, Kamlesh Singh, Ragni Tandon, Pratik Chandra
Asian Journal of Oral Health and Allied Sciences
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Split-mouth clinical trial evaluating pain perception in orthodontic patients using four types of separators: An in viv o study

Thiruthara Pappu Baburaj, Kamlesh Singh, Ragni Tandon, Pratik Chandra
article en

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives needs to include the study aims to evaluate the pain associated with four different types of separators at 4 hours, 24 hours, and on the 5 th day, and to compare the pain levels among the four types. Materials and Methods: Four different types of separators were placed in each quadrant of 54 patients receiving fixed orthodontic treatment, and each quadrant was divided into four groups. In group I, kesling separators were placed, while groups II, III, and IV were given elastomeric, brass wire, and kansal separators, respectively. Pain perception was evaluated after 4 hours, 24 hours, and on the 5 th day using the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS). The NPRS is a 0–10 scale where patients verbally rate their pain, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain. Results: Kansal separators consistently produced the highest pain scores across all time intervals, while kesling separators resulted in the least discomfort. At 4 hours post-placement, the highest mean pain score was observed in the kansal group (7.52 ± 1.57) and the lowest in the kesling group (6.69 ± 1.31), with a statistically significant difference ( P = 0.028). At 24 hours, pain remained highest for kansal separators (7.24 ± 1.63), though the differences were not statistically significant ( P = 0.152). By the 5 th day, overall pain levels had decreased, but kansal separators still recorded the highest pain (6.91 ± 1.54), while kesling recorded the lowest (6.00 ± 1.08), showing a significant difference ( P = 0.012). Conclusion: The type of separator has a significant impact on pain perception. Rigid separators, such as kansal and brass wire, induced higher pain, especially in the initial hours, while flexible separators, such as kesling, caused minimal discomfort. kesling separators may be preferred in patients with low pain tolerance to improve comfort and compliance.

Asian Journal of Oral Health and Allied SciencesVol. 15
Saraswati Dental College and Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Split-mouth clinical trial evaluating pain perception in orthodontic patients using four types of separators: An <i>in viv</i> o study — Thiruthara Pappu Baburaj, Kamlesh Singh, et al. · Asian Journal of Oral Health and Allied Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS