The role of advisory provision and policy objective information in dairy farmers’ preferences for methane-reducing feed additives

Abstract In a discrete choice experiment with 320 Swedish dairy farmers, we investigate preferences for methane-reducing feed additives, finding that higher environmental effectiveness and a farm advisor as the provider of accompanying information increase the probability of adoption. Additionally, an information treatment on methane reduction policy objectives lowers willingness to accept for the 30 per cent methane-reduction level of the feed additive. Latent class analysis shows that innovation-friendly farmers are more likely to be adopters, while those with stronger pro-animal-welfare attitudes are not. Finally, we predict feed additive market shares and discuss the economic implications for emissions reduction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Review of Agricultural Economics
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbaf053
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of advisory provision and policy objective information in dairy farmers’ preferences for methane-reducing feed additives

Uliana Gottlieb, Jens Rommel
European Review of Agricultural Economics
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

The role of advisory provision and policy objective information in dairy farmers’ preferences for methane-reducing feed additives

Uliana Gottlieb, Jens Rommel
article en

Abstract

Abstract In a discrete choice experiment with 320 Swedish dairy farmers, we investigate preferences for methane-reducing feed additives, finding that higher environmental effectiveness and a farm advisor as the provider of accompanying information increase the probability of adoption. Additionally, an information treatment on methane reduction policy objectives lowers willingness to accept for the 30 per cent methane-reduction level of the feed additive. Latent class analysis shows that innovation-friendly farmers are more likely to be adopters, while those with stronger pro-animal-welfare attitudes are not. Finally, we predict feed additive market shares and discuss the economic implications for emissions reduction.

European Review of Agricultural EconomicsVol. 53(1)
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Vetenskapsrådet
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The role of advisory provision and policy objective information in dairy farmers’ preferences for methane-reducing feed additives — Uliana Gottlieb, Jens Rommel · European Review of Agricultural Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS