Are KLIC and CRIME-80 scores useful to assist decision-making initially or at the moment of repeat DAIR? – a retrospective study

<b>Introduction</b>: Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is recommended for early acute postoperative and late acute periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). The KLIC and CRIME-80 scores have been proposed to predict DAIR outcomes. Nevertheless, their clinical utility remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate their predictive value for DAIR failure in our cohort, both at primary indication and when repeat DAIR was considered necessary. <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent DAIR for total hip or knee PJI between 2010 and 2021, with at least 1 year of follow-up. Failure was defined as persistent infection, need for implant removal, amputation, or infection-related death. <b>Results</b>: A total of 102 patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 48.9 months. The overall failure rate was 35.3 %. Failure rates did not differ significantly between patients who underwent a single DAIR and those who required repeat procedures (32.5 % vs. 45.5 %, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:math> 0.26). No significant correlations were found between KLIC or CRIME-80 scores and failure rates, either at the initial indication for DAIR ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:math> 0.54 and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:math> 0.93, respectively) or in repeat DAIR procedures ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:math> 0.44 and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:math> 0.50, respectively). <b>Conclusions</b>: In our cohort, the KLIC and CRIME-80 scores were not predictive of DAIR failure, either at initial treatment or when repeat DAIR was required. These scores offered limited prognostic value and did not support clinical decision-making. Prospective studies are needed to validate and improve predictive tools for DAIR outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bone and Joint Infection
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-10-403-2025
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are KLIC and CRIME-80 scores useful to assist decision-making initially or at the moment of repeat DAIR? – a retrospective study

Mário J. Silva, Ricardo Sousa, Ana Ribau, Carlos Ferreira et al.
Journal of Bone and Joint Infection
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
article

Are KLIC and CRIME-80 scores useful to assist decision-making initially or at the moment of repeat DAIR? – a retrospective study

Mário J. Silva, Ricardo Sousa, Ana Ribau, Carlos Ferreira, Joana Contente, Guilherme Madeira
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction</b>: Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is recommended for early acute postoperative and late acute periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). The KLIC and CRIME-80 scores have been proposed to predict DAIR outcomes. Nevertheless, their clinical utility remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate their predictive value for DAIR failure in our cohort, both at primary indication and when repeat DAIR was considered necessary. <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent DAIR for total hip or knee PJI between 2010 and 2021, with at least 1 year of follow-up. Failure was defined as persistent infection, need for implant removal, amputation, or infection-related death. <b>Results</b>: A total of 102 patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 48.9 months. The overall failure rate was 35.3 %. Failure rates did not differ significantly between patients who underwent a single DAIR and those who required repeat procedures (32.5 % vs. 45.5 %, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:math> 0.26). No significant correlations were found between KLIC or CRIME-80 scores and failure rates, either at the initial indication for DAIR ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:math> 0.54 and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:math> 0.93, respectively) or in repeat DAIR procedures ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:math> 0.44 and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mspace></mml:mspace> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:math> 0.50, respectively). <b>Conclusions</b>: In our cohort, the KLIC and CRIME-80 scores were not predictive of DAIR failure, either at initial treatment or when repeat DAIR was required. These scores offered limited prognostic value and did not support clinical decision-making. Prospective studies are needed to validate and improve predictive tools for DAIR outcomes.

Journal of Bone and Joint InfectionVol. 10(5)
Instituto Politécnico de Leiria (PT), Centro Tecnológico das Indústrias Têxtil e do Vestuário de Portugal (PT), Administração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo (PT), Instituto Politécnico de Santarém (PT), Hospital de Santo António (PT), Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.