External wound zone lacks predictive value for internal injury site in penetrating neck trauma: A prospective analysis

Objectives: To prospectively evaluate the correlation between the anatomical zone of the external wound and the location of internal injuries in patients undergoing exploration for penetrating neck trauma (PNT) in Sana’a, Yemen. Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients presenting to teaching hospitals in Sana’a (January 2020–April 2021) with PNT who required neck exploration. The collected data included demographics, injury mechanisms, clinical presentation, imaging findings, intraoperative findings (external wound zone vs. internal injury site), and outcomes. Correlation was defined as an internal injury occurring within the same anatomical zone as the external wound. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test (p < 0.05). Results: Fifty-five male patients (mean age, 30.0 ± 9.2 years) were included. Gunshot wounds were the most common mechanism (61.8%), and most external wounds were located in Zone II (90.9%). Internal injuries were correlated with the external wound zone in 33 (60.0%) patients, whereas 22 (40.0%) had internal injuries in a different zone (most often inferior). No statistically significant association was found between the external wound zone and internal injury site (p = 0.208) or when analyzing specific zones or injury mechanisms (p > 0.05). Computed tomography angiography (CTA) was performed in 85.1% of patients. Morbidity occurred in 32.7% of the patients, with a mortality rate of 1.8%. Conclusion: The anatomical zone of the external wound demonstrated a poor correlation and no statistically significant association with the site of internal injury in this cohort of patients with PNT requiring exploration. These findings challenge the utility of the traditional zone-based approach in guiding patient management. Patient hemodynamic status, clinical signs, and selective imaging (particularly CTA) appear to be more reliable determinants for intervention, supporting a “no-zone” management strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of emergency medicine, trauma & acute care
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5339/jemtac.2025.33
Primary Topic
Trauma Management and Diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

External wound zone lacks predictive value for internal injury site in penetrating neck trauma: A prospective analysis

Ali Lotf Al-Amry, Yasser Abdurabo Obadiel, Haitham Mohammed Jowah, Waleed Mohammed Gailan et al.
Journal of emergency medicine, trauma & acute care
Trauma Management and Diagnosis
article

External wound zone lacks predictive value for internal injury site in penetrating neck trauma: A prospective analysis

Ali Lotf Al-Amry, Yasser Abdurabo Obadiel, Haitham Mohammed Jowah, Waleed Mohammed Gailan, Waleed Ahmed Al-Ameri
article en

Abstract

Objectives: To prospectively evaluate the correlation between the anatomical zone of the external wound and the location of internal injuries in patients undergoing exploration for penetrating neck trauma (PNT) in Sana’a, Yemen. Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients presenting to teaching hospitals in Sana’a (January 2020–April 2021) with PNT who required neck exploration. The collected data included demographics, injury mechanisms, clinical presentation, imaging findings, intraoperative findings (external wound zone vs. internal injury site), and outcomes. Correlation was defined as an internal injury occurring within the same anatomical zone as the external wound. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test (p < 0.05). Results: Fifty-five male patients (mean age, 30.0 ± 9.2 years) were included. Gunshot wounds were the most common mechanism (61.8%), and most external wounds were located in Zone II (90.9%). Internal injuries were correlated with the external wound zone in 33 (60.0%) patients, whereas 22 (40.0%) had internal injuries in a different zone (most often inferior). No statistically significant association was found between the external wound zone and internal injury site (p = 0.208) or when analyzing specific zones or injury mechanisms (p > 0.05). Computed tomography angiography (CTA) was performed in 85.1% of patients. Morbidity occurred in 32.7% of the patients, with a mortality rate of 1.8%. Conclusion: The anatomical zone of the external wound demonstrated a poor correlation and no statistically significant association with the site of internal injury in this cohort of patients with PNT requiring exploration. These findings challenge the utility of the traditional zone-based approach in guiding patient management. Patient hemodynamic status, clinical signs, and selective imaging (particularly CTA) appear to be more reliable determinants for intervention, supporting a “no-zone” management strategy.

Journal of emergency medicine, trauma & acute careVol. 2025(3)
Sana'a University (YE), University of Modern Sciences (YE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Trauma Management and Diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.