Restoring fire management to Australian deserts: progress after a decade of burning

Background Indigenous people used fire in Australia’s deserts over millennia. Colonisation interrupted these practices, but Indigenous and conservation sectors are now restoring desert fire management for cultural, social and biodiversity outcomes. However, evaluating progress is difficult – inter-fire intervals are long and variable – and fire regimes are dominated by extensive fires after above-average rainfall. Aim To determine whether, despite these challenges, a decade of fire management has influenced fire regimes at four large, separated locations (each 1250–7850 km2) in Australia’s spinifex deserts. Methods We used Landsat and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) imagery to create a >20 year fire history (1997–2019) at four locations, then investigated temporal patterns in seven fire regime metrics, whilst accounting for rainfall variation. Results Management caused (1) a change in fire season (more burns in cooler months); (2) a larger number of smaller fires; (3) an increased seral heterogeneity with burnt/unburnt patch sizes decreased, time-since-fire recovery stages more evenly distributed and mature vegetation extent stabilised. These changes occurred despite above-average rainfall in 2010–2011. Conclusions Management can change desert fire regimes, bringing expected cultural and biodiversity benefits. We provide recommendations for further improvement, noting that prescribed burning in remote deserts is operationally challenging, and investment is needed to meet capacity gaps, and knowledge sharing, monitoring, and research priorities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Wildland Fire
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/wf25056
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Restoring fire management to Australian deserts: progress after a decade of burning

J.K. Chapman, Danae Moore, Stella Shipway, Sarah Legge et al.
International Journal of Wildland Fire
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Restoring fire management to Australian deserts: progress after a decade of burning

J.K. Chapman, Danae Moore, Stella Shipway, Sarah Legge, Hannah B. Cliff, Gareth Catt, Aidan Joseph, Josef Schofield, Michelle Ensbey, Terry Webb, Daniel Johanson, Benjamin Kaethner, Jowel Hyne
article en

Abstract

Background Indigenous people used fire in Australia’s deserts over millennia. Colonisation interrupted these practices, but Indigenous and conservation sectors are now restoring desert fire management for cultural, social and biodiversity outcomes. However, evaluating progress is difficult – inter-fire intervals are long and variable – and fire regimes are dominated by extensive fires after above-average rainfall. Aim To determine whether, despite these challenges, a decade of fire management has influenced fire regimes at four large, separated locations (each 1250–7850 km2) in Australia’s spinifex deserts. Methods We used Landsat and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) imagery to create a >20 year fire history (1997–2019) at four locations, then investigated temporal patterns in seven fire regime metrics, whilst accounting for rainfall variation. Results Management caused (1) a change in fire season (more burns in cooler months); (2) a larger number of smaller fires; (3) an increased seral heterogeneity with burnt/unburnt patch sizes decreased, time-since-fire recovery stages more evenly distributed and mature vegetation extent stabilised. These changes occurred despite above-average rainfall in 2010–2011. Conclusions Management can change desert fire regimes, bringing expected cultural and biodiversity benefits. We provide recommendations for further improvement, noting that prescribed burning in remote deserts is operationally challenging, and investment is needed to meet capacity gaps, and knowledge sharing, monitoring, and research priorities.

International Journal of Wildland FireVol. 34(11)
Australian National University (AU), Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Australian Wildlife Conservancy (AU), Bush Heritage Australia (AU), Central Land Council (AU), CRC for Spatial information (AU), Charles Darwin University (AU), Department of the Premier and Cabinet (AU), Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.