Defending the innovation district: Violence, urban entrepreneurialism, and the privatization of public security in Monterrey, Mexico

Over the past four decades, urban scholars have paid increased attention to how private sectors pursue capital gain in and through the city, including through carving out innovation districts. While the privatization of public space is well-established in this literature, less is known about how entrepreneurial districts can further the privatization of public security. Drawing on and extending this line of work, this article examines how a private sector can leverage the local state, an anchor institution (a university), and district residents to create what we call a defended entrepreneurial district— an entrepreneurial district receiving priority public–private policing from above and heightened neighborhood vigilance from below to secure a territory for capital gain in a high-violence context. Our case study is the Distrito Tec, a private university-led innovation district launched in 2014 in Monterrey, Mexico in the aftermath of a major metropolitan security crisis. While the university removed walls from its block perimeter, we argue that it simultaneously reinstated new forms of socio-spatial enclosure at a district level. New public–private policing initiatives deepened surveillance of the 24 blocks in its vicinity favoring the concentration of capital within while prompting new divisions among unwilling residents and the exclusion of unwanted populations. Methodologically, we combine qualitative data on socio-spatial responses to violence collected 6 years apart—during the height and aftermath of this public security crisis. Our comparative analysis contributes to conversations on ethnographic revisits, while advancing research on the privatization of public security in entrepreneurial districts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Comparative Sociology
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00207152251387926
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defending the innovation district: Violence, urban entrepreneurialism, and the privatization of public security in Monterrey, Mexico

Ana Villarreal, Dairee Ramírez
International Journal of Comparative Sociology
Urban Planning and Governance
article

Defending the innovation district: Violence, urban entrepreneurialism, and the privatization of public security in Monterrey, Mexico

Ana Villarreal, Dairee Ramírez
article en

Abstract

Over the past four decades, urban scholars have paid increased attention to how private sectors pursue capital gain in and through the city, including through carving out innovation districts. While the privatization of public space is well-established in this literature, less is known about how entrepreneurial districts can further the privatization of public security. Drawing on and extending this line of work, this article examines how a private sector can leverage the local state, an anchor institution (a university), and district residents to create what we call a defended entrepreneurial district— an entrepreneurial district receiving priority public–private policing from above and heightened neighborhood vigilance from below to secure a territory for capital gain in a high-violence context. Our case study is the Distrito Tec, a private university-led innovation district launched in 2014 in Monterrey, Mexico in the aftermath of a major metropolitan security crisis. While the university removed walls from its block perimeter, we argue that it simultaneously reinstated new forms of socio-spatial enclosure at a district level. New public–private policing initiatives deepened surveillance of the 24 blocks in its vicinity favoring the concentration of capital within while prompting new divisions among unwilling residents and the exclusion of unwanted populations. Methodologically, we combine qualitative data on socio-spatial responses to violence collected 6 years apart—during the height and aftermath of this public security crisis. Our comparative analysis contributes to conversations on ethnographic revisits, while advancing research on the privatization of public security in entrepreneurial districts.

International Journal of Comparative Sociology
Boston University (US), El Colegio de México (MX), Harvard University Press (US), University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.