Biological age in critical care: current evidence, future prospects, and clinical implications

Accurate assessment of critically ill patients is essential for informing treatment decisions and predicting outcomes. While chronological age-defined by the number of years lived-is commonly used in clinical practice, it does not necessarily capture a patient's true physiological status. In contrast, biological age, which reflects genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors, offers a more precise indicator of overall health. Emerging evidence supports its potential as a robust predictor of mortality, intensive care readmission, and disease severity in conditions such as sepsis and respiratory failure. Notably, unlike the linear progression of chronological age, biological age can fluctuate in response to acute stress and may revert to lower levels if the patient's condition improves. This dynamic property underscores the utility of biological age in guiding invasive procedures, refining medication strategies, and optimizing nutrition and rehabilitation. The present study provides an overview of the definitions and methods used to calculate biological age, examines its current applications in critical care, and discusses its prospective roles in intensive care unit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1686899
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biological age in critical care: current evidence, future prospects, and clinical implications

Wen Jiao Han, Libing Jiang
1 citations
Frontiers in Medicine
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
1.35
article

Biological age in critical care: current evidence, future prospects, and clinical implications

Wen Jiao Han, Libing Jiang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Accurate assessment of critically ill patients is essential for informing treatment decisions and predicting outcomes. While chronological age-defined by the number of years lived-is commonly used in clinical practice, it does not necessarily capture a patient's true physiological status. In contrast, biological age, which reflects genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors, offers a more precise indicator of overall health. Emerging evidence supports its potential as a robust predictor of mortality, intensive care readmission, and disease severity in conditions such as sepsis and respiratory failure. Notably, unlike the linear progression of chronological age, biological age can fluctuate in response to acute stress and may revert to lower levels if the patient's condition improves. This dynamic property underscores the utility of biological age in guiding invasive procedures, refining medication strategies, and optimizing nutrition and rehabilitation. The present study provides an overview of the definitions and methods used to calculate biological age, examines its current applications in critical care, and discusses its prospective roles in intensive care unit.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 12
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (CN)
Zhejiang Medical Association
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.