Contractual learning and organizational design in public procurement

Purpose The purpose of this study is to empirically explore how contractual learning in public procurement is affected by organizational design. Design/methodology/approach Two inductive case studies are based on semi-structured interviews and document analysis. Findings The author finds that the consolidation of economic, technical and legal tasks in specific units can strengthen contractual learning in public procurement through specialization and the codification of contractual processes, and that the level of integration between units affects the type of learning that occurs. Particularly, the integration of economic and technical units promotes learning concerning control-oriented terms and legal integration in the procurement process leads to a more adaptive use of contractual safeguards. Research limitations/implications Public procurement laws and regulations that constrain contractual adaptation appear to promote learning concerning safeguards and control-oriented terms. Contrary to previous research, the findings of this study indicate that stronger economic-technical integration may lead to the development of more control-oriented contracts, whereas integration of legal specialists promotes the development of more adaptive and less restrictive control-oriented terms in procurement contracts. Overall, this result presents two novel mechanisms for linking organizational design to contractual learning. Practical implications The author suggests that public organizations should develop dedicated technical units for contract governance. Focusing specialized technical knowledge in the post-signing phase of the procurement process provides an important feedback mechanism for finding new contractual solutions and developing better procurement contracts. The author also suggests that public organizations should aim to integrate legal specialists in the early phases of the procurement process to promote a nuanced use of contractual safeguards. Social implications Contractual learning facilitates a better use of public resources in procurement. Originality/value This study is a novel exploration of contractual learning in the context of public procurement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Procurement
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jopp-11-2024-0123
Primary Topic
Public Procurement and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contractual learning and organizational design in public procurement

Niklas Lars Hallberg
Journal of Public Procurement
Public Procurement and Policy
article

Contractual learning and organizational design in public procurement

Niklas Lars Hallberg
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to empirically explore how contractual learning in public procurement is affected by organizational design. Design/methodology/approach Two inductive case studies are based on semi-structured interviews and document analysis. Findings The author finds that the consolidation of economic, technical and legal tasks in specific units can strengthen contractual learning in public procurement through specialization and the codification of contractual processes, and that the level of integration between units affects the type of learning that occurs. Particularly, the integration of economic and technical units promotes learning concerning control-oriented terms and legal integration in the procurement process leads to a more adaptive use of contractual safeguards. Research limitations/implications Public procurement laws and regulations that constrain contractual adaptation appear to promote learning concerning safeguards and control-oriented terms. Contrary to previous research, the findings of this study indicate that stronger economic-technical integration may lead to the development of more control-oriented contracts, whereas integration of legal specialists promotes the development of more adaptive and less restrictive control-oriented terms in procurement contracts. Overall, this result presents two novel mechanisms for linking organizational design to contractual learning. Practical implications The author suggests that public organizations should develop dedicated technical units for contract governance. Focusing specialized technical knowledge in the post-signing phase of the procurement process provides an important feedback mechanism for finding new contractual solutions and developing better procurement contracts. The author also suggests that public organizations should aim to integrate legal specialists in the early phases of the procurement process to promote a nuanced use of contractual safeguards. Social implications Contractual learning facilitates a better use of public resources in procurement. Originality/value This study is a novel exploration of contractual learning in the context of public procurement.

Journal of Public Procurement
Lund University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Public Procurement and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.