A step towards sustainable concrete with the utilization of M-sand in concrete production: A review

Abstract Manufactured sand (M-sand or MS) conserves natural resources and enhances concrete performance and sustainability. However, a comprehensive and updated review is required to summarize and compare the weak and strong points of MS in concrete compared to natural sand (N-sand). This review synthesizes the current research on MS as an alternative material in concrete production. The review discussed the background and current problems associated with natural river sand in the construction industry, the production of MS, biographic analysis, physical and chemical properties of MS, the impact of MS on concrete strength, durability, microstructure, and sustainability performance. Results indicate that MS has physical and chemical properties comparable to N-sand, and produces concrete with improved strength, durability, microstructure, and sustainability. However, MS negatively impacts the flowability of concrete. Finally, the review recommends proposed research gaps that need to be explored in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
REVIEWS ON ADVANCED MATERIALS SCIENCE
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/rams-2025-0162
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A step towards sustainable concrete with the utilization of M-sand in concrete production: A review

Hisham Jahangir Qureshi, Wael Alattyih, Jawad Ahmad, Abdulmoez Al Ismaeel
1 citations
REVIEWS ON ADVANCED MATERIALS SCIENCE
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
0.95
article

A step towards sustainable concrete with the utilization of M-sand in concrete production: A review

Hisham Jahangir Qureshi, Wael Alattyih, Jawad Ahmad, Abdulmoez Al Ismaeel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Manufactured sand (M-sand or MS) conserves natural resources and enhances concrete performance and sustainability. However, a comprehensive and updated review is required to summarize and compare the weak and strong points of MS in concrete compared to natural sand (N-sand). This review synthesizes the current research on MS as an alternative material in concrete production. The review discussed the background and current problems associated with natural river sand in the construction industry, the production of MS, biographic analysis, physical and chemical properties of MS, the impact of MS on concrete strength, durability, microstructure, and sustainability performance. Results indicate that MS has physical and chemical properties comparable to N-sand, and produces concrete with improved strength, durability, microstructure, and sustainability. However, MS negatively impacts the flowability of concrete. Finally, the review recommends proposed research gaps that need to be explored in the future.

REVIEWS ON ADVANCED MATERIALS SCIENCEVol. 64(1)
Qassim University (SA), National University of Technology (PK), King Faisal University (SA)
King Faisal University
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A step towards sustainable concrete with the utilization of M-sand in concrete production: A review — Hisham Jahangir Qureshi, Wael Alattyih, et al. · REVIEWS ON ADVANCED MATERIALS SCIENCE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS