Optimizing Formative Assessment with Learning Analytics

Formative assessment is a key element of effective education. Recently, a growing body of evidence has highlighted the potential of learning analytics to support formative assessment. However, this evidence is sparse, and concerns have been raised about the connection between learning analytics results and formative assessment models. When learning analytics results do not align well with formative assessment models, teachers may be hesitant to place trust in, interpret, and act upon the insights provided by learning analytics for formative assessment. In this study, we address this concern by adopting a well-established formative assessment model and conducting a systematic review to explore how learning analytics can support formative assessment. A total of 93 relevant articles, published between 2011 and 2023 and retrieved from Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and ACM, were analyzed using a coding scheme grounded in a formative assessment model. Drawing on the model of formative assessment, we report how learning analytics can support formative assessment by connecting the three key actors, teachers, students as peers, and students as self-assessors with the three critical stages of the process: (a) where the learner is going, (b) where the learner is now, and (c) how the learner is getting there. This study extends our understanding of the alignment between learning analytics results and theoretical concepts and further contributes to the advancement of the application of learning analytics for formative assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Educational Research
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543251370753
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Formative Assessment with Learning Analytics

Halszka Jarodzka, Hendrik Drachsler, Dragan Gašević, Seyyed Kazem Banihashem et al.
Review of Educational Research
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Optimizing Formative Assessment with Learning Analytics

Halszka Jarodzka, Hendrik Drachsler, Dragan Gašević, Seyyed Kazem Banihashem, Omid Noroozi, Desirée Joosten-ten Brinke
article en

Abstract

Formative assessment is a key element of effective education. Recently, a growing body of evidence has highlighted the potential of learning analytics to support formative assessment. However, this evidence is sparse, and concerns have been raised about the connection between learning analytics results and formative assessment models. When learning analytics results do not align well with formative assessment models, teachers may be hesitant to place trust in, interpret, and act upon the insights provided by learning analytics for formative assessment. In this study, we address this concern by adopting a well-established formative assessment model and conducting a systematic review to explore how learning analytics can support formative assessment. A total of 93 relevant articles, published between 2011 and 2023 and retrieved from Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and ACM, were analyzed using a coding scheme grounded in a formative assessment model. Drawing on the model of formative assessment, we report how learning analytics can support formative assessment by connecting the three key actors, teachers, students as peers, and students as self-assessors with the three critical stages of the process: (a) where the learner is going, (b) where the learner is now, and (c) how the learner is getting there. This study extends our understanding of the alignment between learning analytics results and theoretical concepts and further contributes to the advancement of the application of learning analytics for formative assessment.

Review of Educational Research
Open Universities Australia (AU), Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Goethe-Institute United Kingdom (GB), Leibniz Institute for Psychology (DE), Maastricht University (NL), DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education (DE), Monash University (AU), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.