An in vitro evaluation of fat-extracted pongamia seedcake in barley-based feedlot diets

There is growing interest in identifying alternative sustainable feed ingredients for ruminant diets. This study evaluated four processed pongamia seedcake (PSC) meals—three produced using a proprietary extraction method and one by traditional hexane extraction—in two separate in vitro experiments. Experiment 1 assessed PSC as a partial replacement for conventional protein meals (canola and cottonseed) at total inclusion levels of 0, 4, or 8% DM. Experiment 2 evaluated PSC as a partial replacement for an energy source (barley grain) at final inclusion levels of 0, 12, 15, or 30% DM. There was no interaction between level × processing type (P ≥ 0.10) in either experiment. In Experiment 1, neither the type nor the level of PSC affected methane production (mL/g digested DM). Replacement of canola or cottonseed meal with PSC reduced ( P < 0.01) in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) by an average of 7% across all PSC types and inclusion levels compared with the control. However, total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations were not affected by PSC type or level. In Experiment 2, inclusion of PSC in a barley-based diet increased ( P < 0.01) methane production (mL/g digested DM) by up to 20.8% compared with the control. IVDMD was not affected by PSC inclusion up to 15% DM ( P > 0.05). Processing type had varying effects: PSC4 (hexane-extracted) had 5.5% greater IVDMD ( P = 0.02) than PSC1 and 3.8% greater than PSC2 but was similar to PSC3—all three produced using the novel extraction methods. These findings suggest that PSC processed with novel extraction methods has potential as a feed ingredient, but its application requires careful consideration. While it can replace conventional protein meals without reducing total VFA production, this may occur at the cost of reduced diet digestibility. Furthermore, when PSC replaces barley grain, methane production may increase. The suitability of PSC therefore depends on the extraction method, inclusion level, and the dietary component it replaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Animal Science
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2025.1685542
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An in vitro evaluation of fat-extracted pongamia seedcake in barley-based feedlot diets

Alex V. Chaves, Sarah J. Meale, Eslam Ahmed, Mingbo Ni
Frontiers in Animal Science
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

An in vitro evaluation of fat-extracted pongamia seedcake in barley-based feedlot diets

Alex V. Chaves, Sarah J. Meale, Eslam Ahmed, Mingbo Ni
article en

Abstract

There is growing interest in identifying alternative sustainable feed ingredients for ruminant diets. This study evaluated four processed pongamia seedcake (PSC) meals—three produced using a proprietary extraction method and one by traditional hexane extraction—in two separate in vitro experiments. Experiment 1 assessed PSC as a partial replacement for conventional protein meals (canola and cottonseed) at total inclusion levels of 0, 4, or 8% DM. Experiment 2 evaluated PSC as a partial replacement for an energy source (barley grain) at final inclusion levels of 0, 12, 15, or 30% DM. There was no interaction between level × processing type (P ≥ 0.10) in either experiment. In Experiment 1, neither the type nor the level of PSC affected methane production (mL/g digested DM). Replacement of canola or cottonseed meal with PSC reduced ( P < 0.01) in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) by an average of 7% across all PSC types and inclusion levels compared with the control. However, total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations were not affected by PSC type or level. In Experiment 2, inclusion of PSC in a barley-based diet increased ( P < 0.01) methane production (mL/g digested DM) by up to 20.8% compared with the control. IVDMD was not affected by PSC inclusion up to 15% DM ( P > 0.05). Processing type had varying effects: PSC4 (hexane-extracted) had 5.5% greater IVDMD ( P = 0.02) than PSC1 and 3.8% greater than PSC2 but was similar to PSC3—all three produced using the novel extraction methods. These findings suggest that PSC processed with novel extraction methods has potential as a feed ingredient, but its application requires careful consideration. While it can replace conventional protein meals without reducing total VFA production, this may occur at the cost of reduced diet digestibility. Furthermore, when PSC replaces barley grain, methane production may increase. The suitability of PSC therefore depends on the extraction method, inclusion level, and the dietary component it replaces.

Frontiers in Animal ScienceVol. 6
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), South Valley University (EG), Department of Primary Industries (AU)
Meat and Livestock Australia, Arrow Energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.