The role of community-based organizations in educational partnerships for equity: perspectives from Singapore

Cross-sector educational partnerships are increasingly seen as critical levers for addressing educational inequities, with a growing shift from transactional support models to collaborative equity-driven ones. Community-based organizations are often involved in the support ecology for underprivileged youths to provide additional resources and services such as tutoring, school supplies, and access to technology. While such efforts appear to help reduce absenteeism and drop-outs, improve academic performance, and enhance general development and welfare, the role such organizations play is less examined in research. While international scholarship highlights equitable partnerships and independent community-based organization as part of a sustainable approach to support underprivileged students, less is known about how this unfolds in highly centralized, state-directed contexts. The paper addresses this gap by offering a Singaporean perspective where educational partnerships are shaped by a state-led developmental framework that privileges academic meritocracy and performance-based outcomes. Focusing on community-based organizations, the paper examines how those supporting underprivileged youths operate within the dominant “Learning as Social Service” model. This model provides remedial support to help students “catch up” and succeed within the existing system rather than address structural inequities. A critical discourse analysis on the annual reports of two key selected organizations of this model further explores their approaches, contributions as well as limitations of their partnerships to educational equity. The analysis reveals that while the organizations are well-placed to provide needed support for underprivileged youths, their work mainly falls within the frame of compensatory meritocracy that limits the equity pursuit by treating educational gaps as technical deficits rather than systemic issues. The paper argues for a reimagining of educational partnerships through the lens of collaborative governance and equity-centered practice—transformative approaches that center on community ownership, student agency and holistic development to address education disparities more effectively. By offering a Singaporean perspective on the intersection of educational equity and meritocratic culture, this paper contributes to the global discourse on how to strengthen equity in and through educational collaborations, particularly in outcomes-oriented, and highly structured environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1673198
Primary Topic
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of community-based organizations in educational partnerships for equity: perspectives from Singapore

Siao See Teng, H Lee, Ainun Najib, Thilanga Dilum Wewalaarachchi
Frontiers in Education
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
article

The role of community-based organizations in educational partnerships for equity: perspectives from Singapore

Siao See Teng, H Lee, Ainun Najib, Thilanga Dilum Wewalaarachchi
article en

Abstract

Cross-sector educational partnerships are increasingly seen as critical levers for addressing educational inequities, with a growing shift from transactional support models to collaborative equity-driven ones. Community-based organizations are often involved in the support ecology for underprivileged youths to provide additional resources and services such as tutoring, school supplies, and access to technology. While such efforts appear to help reduce absenteeism and drop-outs, improve academic performance, and enhance general development and welfare, the role such organizations play is less examined in research. While international scholarship highlights equitable partnerships and independent community-based organization as part of a sustainable approach to support underprivileged students, less is known about how this unfolds in highly centralized, state-directed contexts. The paper addresses this gap by offering a Singaporean perspective where educational partnerships are shaped by a state-led developmental framework that privileges academic meritocracy and performance-based outcomes. Focusing on community-based organizations, the paper examines how those supporting underprivileged youths operate within the dominant “Learning as Social Service” model. This model provides remedial support to help students “catch up” and succeed within the existing system rather than address structural inequities. A critical discourse analysis on the annual reports of two key selected organizations of this model further explores their approaches, contributions as well as limitations of their partnerships to educational equity. The analysis reveals that while the organizations are well-placed to provide needed support for underprivileged youths, their work mainly falls within the frame of compensatory meritocracy that limits the equity pursuit by treating educational gaps as technical deficits rather than systemic issues. The paper argues for a reimagining of educational partnerships through the lens of collaborative governance and equity-centered practice—transformative approaches that center on community ownership, student agency and holistic development to address education disparities more effectively. By offering a Singaporean perspective on the intersection of educational equity and meritocratic culture, this paper contributes to the global discourse on how to strengthen equity in and through educational collaborations, particularly in outcomes-oriented, and highly structured environments.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
National University of Singapore (SG), Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.