A national snapshot of data collection in Australian clinical toxicology units

Background Clinical toxicology units manage an increasing number of poisonings in Australia. Many units maintain observational databases of presentations. This study aimed to describe the current state of data collection across Australian clinical toxicology units.Methods This was a cross-sectional descriptive study using survey methodology of Australian clinical toxicology units. Each unit was electronically surveyed regarding the data collection methods in use at their site and the characteristics of data collected.Results All thirteen units responded, with ten units using a database. Of these, seven used REDCap®, two used FileMaker and one used Microsoft Excel®. Among the ten units that use databases, five of the ten collected detailed presentation data (ingestion details, disposition) and detailed complication data (e.g. cardiac arrest, dysrhythmia, seizure, hypotension, coma, organ injury) and six of the ten collected detailed treatment data (e.g. intubation, inotropes, charcoal, dialysis, antidote), five of which were the units that collected detailed presentation data.Conclusion There is considerable variation between units and only 38% of which comprehensive data were collected. Those collecting more detailed data have high congruence among the elements collected, providing a potential starting point for a minimum data set to improve data collection in clinical toxicology units.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Toxicology Communications
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/24734306.2025.2572141
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Immunotoxicology and immune responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A national snapshot of data collection in Australian clinical toxicology units

Andrew Staib, Katherine Isoardi, Amanda Holford
1 citations
Toxicology Communications
Immunotoxicology and immune responses
0.80
article

A national snapshot of data collection in Australian clinical toxicology units

Andrew Staib, Katherine Isoardi, Amanda Holford
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background Clinical toxicology units manage an increasing number of poisonings in Australia. Many units maintain observational databases of presentations. This study aimed to describe the current state of data collection across Australian clinical toxicology units.Methods This was a cross-sectional descriptive study using survey methodology of Australian clinical toxicology units. Each unit was electronically surveyed regarding the data collection methods in use at their site and the characteristics of data collected.Results All thirteen units responded, with ten units using a database. Of these, seven used REDCap®, two used FileMaker and one used Microsoft Excel®. Among the ten units that use databases, five of the ten collected detailed presentation data (ingestion details, disposition) and detailed complication data (e.g. cardiac arrest, dysrhythmia, seizure, hypotension, coma, organ injury) and six of the ten collected detailed treatment data (e.g. intubation, inotropes, charcoal, dialysis, antidote), five of which were the units that collected detailed presentation data.Conclusion There is considerable variation between units and only 38% of which comprehensive data were collected. Those collecting more detailed data have high congruence among the elements collected, providing a potential starting point for a minimum data set to improve data collection in clinical toxicology units.

Toxicology CommunicationsVol. 9(1)
The University of Queensland (AU), Princess Alexandra Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Immunotoxicology and immune responses
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.