Generalized Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects Using the Covariate Balancing Procedure

In observational studies, the propensity score plays a central role in estimating causal effects of interest. The inverse probability weighting (IPW) estimator is commonly used for this purpose. However, if the propensity score model is misspecified, the IPW estimator may produce biased estimates of causal effects. Previous studies have proposed some robust propensity score estimation procedures. However, these methods require considering parameters that dominate the uncertainty of sampling and treatment allocation. This study proposes a novel Bayesian estimating procedure that necessitates probabilistically deciding the parameter, rather than deterministically. Since the IPW estimator and propensity score estimator can be derived as solutions to certain loss functions, the general Bayesian paradigm, which does not require considering the full likelihood, can be applied. Therefore, our proposed method only requires the same level of assumptions as ordinary causal inference contexts. The proposed Bayesian method demonstrates equal or superior results compared to some previous methods in simulation experiments and is also applied to real data, namely the Whitehall dataset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biometrical Journal
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.70085
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generalized Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects Using the Covariate Balancing Procedure

Tomotaka Momozaki, Tomoyuki Nakagawa, Shunichiro Orihara
Biometrical Journal
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

Generalized Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects Using the Covariate Balancing Procedure

Tomotaka Momozaki, Tomoyuki Nakagawa, Shunichiro Orihara
article en

Abstract

In observational studies, the propensity score plays a central role in estimating causal effects of interest. The inverse probability weighting (IPW) estimator is commonly used for this purpose. However, if the propensity score model is misspecified, the IPW estimator may produce biased estimates of causal effects. Previous studies have proposed some robust propensity score estimation procedures. However, these methods require considering parameters that dominate the uncertainty of sampling and treatment allocation. This study proposes a novel Bayesian estimating procedure that necessitates probabilistically deciding the parameter, rather than deterministically. Since the IPW estimator and propensity score estimator can be derived as solutions to certain loss functions, the general Bayesian paradigm, which does not require considering the full likelihood, can be applied. Therefore, our proposed method only requires the same level of assumptions as ordinary causal inference contexts. The proposed Bayesian method demonstrates equal or superior results compared to some previous methods in simulation experiments and is also applied to real data, namely the Whitehall dataset.

Biometrical JournalVol. 67(6)
Tokyo University of Information Sciences (JP), Tokyo Medical University (JP), Tokyo University of Science (JP), RIKEN Center for Brain Science (JP), University of Tokyo Health Sciences (JP), Meisei University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.