Intraspecific variation in prey quality affects the consumption rates of top predators

Prey quality, measured as energy density and energy content, is a key functional trait in predator-prey relationships. While the effects of interspecific differences in prey quality on predators have been examined previously, the consequences of intraspecific variation remain less understood. To examine how within-species variation in prey quality influences predator foraging, we modelled the effects of prey size, maturity and sampling season and region on the quality of Engraulis mordax, Sardinops sagax and Doryteuthis opalescens-three common prey species for top predators in the California Current Ecosystem (CCE). We contextualized our findings using documented energy budgets of the California sea lion (Zalophus californianus), a consumer of these species and an important ecosystem indicator in the CCE. We found significant within-species variation in prey quality related to size, maturity, season and region, with stronger effects in fish than squid. These patterns likely reflect prey life history and regional and seasonal oceanographic conditions that influence energy storage. Under static prey availability and predator energy demands, daily biomass requirements driven by intraspecific variation in prey quality were comparable to previous estimates based on interspecific differences. By integrating predator bioenergetics with prey energy content models, we found that the number of prey required can vary by tens of thousands depending on prey size-rendering smaller individuals an impractical energy source for non-filter-feeding predators. Even accounting for size, predators may need to consume up to twice as many individuals when foraging on lower-quality prey from certain regions, seasons or maturity stages compared to higher-quality conspecifics. Our findings highlight the critical importance of incorporating intraspecific variation in prey quality into bioenergetics frameworks that inform predator foraging predictions. As climate change and resource exploitation intensify, integrating functional traits and energetic trade-offs into predator-prey studies will be essential for anticipating predator responses and evaluating ecosystem resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Ecology
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.70155
Primary Topic
Marine animal studies overview
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intraspecific variation in prey quality affects the consumption rates of top predators

Emmanis Dorval, Stephanie E. Nehasil, Juan P. Zwolinski, Carolyn M. Kurle
Journal of Animal Ecology
Marine animal studies overview
article

Intraspecific variation in prey quality affects the consumption rates of top predators

Emmanis Dorval, Stephanie E. Nehasil, Juan P. Zwolinski, Carolyn M. Kurle
article en

Abstract

Prey quality, measured as energy density and energy content, is a key functional trait in predator-prey relationships. While the effects of interspecific differences in prey quality on predators have been examined previously, the consequences of intraspecific variation remain less understood. To examine how within-species variation in prey quality influences predator foraging, we modelled the effects of prey size, maturity and sampling season and region on the quality of Engraulis mordax, Sardinops sagax and Doryteuthis opalescens-three common prey species for top predators in the California Current Ecosystem (CCE). We contextualized our findings using documented energy budgets of the California sea lion (Zalophus californianus), a consumer of these species and an important ecosystem indicator in the CCE. We found significant within-species variation in prey quality related to size, maturity, season and region, with stronger effects in fish than squid. These patterns likely reflect prey life history and regional and seasonal oceanographic conditions that influence energy storage. Under static prey availability and predator energy demands, daily biomass requirements driven by intraspecific variation in prey quality were comparable to previous estimates based on interspecific differences. By integrating predator bioenergetics with prey energy content models, we found that the number of prey required can vary by tens of thousands depending on prey size-rendering smaller individuals an impractical energy source for non-filter-feeding predators. Even accounting for size, predators may need to consume up to twice as many individuals when foraging on lower-quality prey from certain regions, seasons or maturity stages compared to higher-quality conspecifics. Our findings highlight the critical importance of incorporating intraspecific variation in prey quality into bioenergetics frameworks that inform predator foraging predictions. As climate change and resource exploitation intensify, integrating functional traits and energetic trade-offs into predator-prey studies will be essential for anticipating predator responses and evaluating ecosystem resilience.

Journal of Animal EcologyVol. 95(1)
Lynn University (US), University of California, Santa Cruz (US), University of California San Diego (US), NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Fisheries Science Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Marine animal studies overview
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.