Frame-dependence of the Hamilton–Jacobi formalism for inflation and reheating in non-minimal gravity

Abstract In this work, we investigate the Hamilton–Jacobi formalism for non-minimally coupled inflation, focusing on the methodological frame-dependence arising from its application in the Jordan and Einstein frames. We systematically compare the physical predictions from two distinct computational schemes: applying the Hamilton–Jacobi approximation before versus after the conformal transformation. This comparison is conducted for both the metric and Palatini formalisms. Our results, consistent with Planck data, reveal significant quantitative differences between the two schemes, highlighting a subtle frame-dependence in the approximation method. These discrepancies, observed in the spectral index, the tensor-to-scalar ratio, and reheating parameters, are more pronounced in the Palatini formalism. Our study emphasizes the sensitivity of cosmological predictions to the computational path chosen, and provides a quantitative analysis of this methodological uncertainty, offering valuable insights into the robustness of predictions in modified gravity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Physical Journal C
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14968-3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frame-dependence of the Hamilton–Jacobi formalism for inflation and reheating in non-minimal gravity

Rongrong Zhai, Feng-Yi Zhang, Li-Yang Chen
1 citations
The European Physical Journal C
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
1.15
article

Frame-dependence of the Hamilton–Jacobi formalism for inflation and reheating in non-minimal gravity

Rongrong Zhai, Feng-Yi Zhang, Li-Yang Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this work, we investigate the Hamilton–Jacobi formalism for non-minimally coupled inflation, focusing on the methodological frame-dependence arising from its application in the Jordan and Einstein frames. We systematically compare the physical predictions from two distinct computational schemes: applying the Hamilton–Jacobi approximation before versus after the conformal transformation. This comparison is conducted for both the metric and Palatini formalisms. Our results, consistent with Planck data, reveal significant quantitative differences between the two schemes, highlighting a subtle frame-dependence in the approximation method. These discrepancies, observed in the spectral index, the tensor-to-scalar ratio, and reheating parameters, are more pronounced in the Palatini formalism. Our study emphasizes the sensitivity of cosmological predictions to the computational path chosen, and provides a quantitative analysis of this methodological uncertainty, offering valuable insights into the robustness of predictions in modified gravity.

The European Physical Journal CVol. 85(10)
Xinzhou Teachers University (CN), Chengdu Normal University (CN), University of South China (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.