Hidden gems: small woody landscape features on agricultural land are overlooked in current assessments of agroforestry in Germany

Abstract In the light of escalating climate challenges, agroforestry is receiving renewed attention for its potential to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions while enhancing the resilience of agricultural systems. The main difference between agroforestry and conventional agricultural systems is the presence and management of woody landscape features (WLF). The few datasets assessing WLF on agricultural land are limited in their spatial resolution and apply minimum mapping thresholds, potentially biasing derived estimates of WLF characteristics. Our study aimed to assess the current extent of WLF in Germany with high spatial resolution, including size variability and WLF type composition. We investigated WLF on agricultural land across seven federal states. In each of the seven states, 100 grid cells totalling 25 km 2 of agricultural land were selected, amounting to a total area of 175 km 2 . Within this area, WLF were manually identified, delineated and classified using digital orthophotos. The results were compared with state-of-the-art datasets, particularly the Digital Basic Landscape Model (ATKIS). We identified a total of 4.8 km 2 land hosting WLF, covering 2.7% of the investigated area. The extent of WLF estimated in our study was twice as large as the estimate derived from the ATKIS dataset. Overall, we identified a much larger number of WLF, which were on average much smaller in size compared to the WLF in the ATKIS dataset. Extrapolating our results to the national level, we estimate WLF coverage at 4,899 km 2 , corresponding to 57.2 Tg above-ground biomass or 28.6 Tg carbon. The biomass and carbon content were estimated based on literature-derived biomass densities. Our study indicates that accurately assessing WLF requires higher spatial resolutions than previously used. Datasets based on low-resolution images and those using minimal mapping units are not suited for capturing small WLF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agroforestry Systems
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-025-01358-7
Primary Topic
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hidden gems: small woody landscape features on agricultural land are overlooked in current assessments of agroforestry in Germany

Zoe Schindler, Nora Obladen, Christopher Morhart, Jonathan P. Sheppard et al.
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
article

Hidden gems: small woody landscape features on agricultural land are overlooked in current assessments of agroforestry in Germany

Zoe Schindler, Nora Obladen, Christopher Morhart, Jonathan P. Sheppard, Thomas Seifert, Pawan Datta, Elena Larysch, Katja Kröner
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the light of escalating climate challenges, agroforestry is receiving renewed attention for its potential to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions while enhancing the resilience of agricultural systems. The main difference between agroforestry and conventional agricultural systems is the presence and management of woody landscape features (WLF). The few datasets assessing WLF on agricultural land are limited in their spatial resolution and apply minimum mapping thresholds, potentially biasing derived estimates of WLF characteristics. Our study aimed to assess the current extent of WLF in Germany with high spatial resolution, including size variability and WLF type composition. We investigated WLF on agricultural land across seven federal states. In each of the seven states, 100 grid cells totalling 25 km 2 of agricultural land were selected, amounting to a total area of 175 km 2 . Within this area, WLF were manually identified, delineated and classified using digital orthophotos. The results were compared with state-of-the-art datasets, particularly the Digital Basic Landscape Model (ATKIS). We identified a total of 4.8 km 2 land hosting WLF, covering 2.7% of the investigated area. The extent of WLF estimated in our study was twice as large as the estimate derived from the ATKIS dataset. Overall, we identified a much larger number of WLF, which were on average much smaller in size compared to the WLF in the ATKIS dataset. Extrapolating our results to the national level, we estimate WLF coverage at 4,899 km 2 , corresponding to 57.2 Tg above-ground biomass or 28.6 Tg carbon. The biomass and carbon content were estimated based on literature-derived biomass densities. Our study indicates that accurately assessing WLF requires higher spatial resolutions than previously used. Datasets based on low-resolution images and those using minimal mapping units are not suited for capturing small WLF.

Agroforestry SystemsVol. 99(8)
University of Freiburg (DE), Stellenbosch University (ZA), Berlin Centre of Competence for Water (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.