Metaphor Comprehension of Chinese Learners of English: Individual Differences Perspective

The mechanisms underlying metaphor comprehension, particularly the roles of analogical reasoning and language-specific conceptual integration have long been debated, with most studies focusing on English as L1 while paying limited attention to L2 contexts. Based on that, this study explores how three individual difference factors—fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, and L2 proficiency—influence the comprehension of L2 metaphors with varying degrees of complexity among Chinese EFL learners. Since fluid intelligence is closely associated with analogical reasoning, while crystallized intelligence facilitates the language-specific conceptual combination, this study further investigates their respective contributions, alongside L2 proficiency, to metaphor comprehension. Adopting an individual-difference approach, this study investigated Chinese learners’ metaphorical competence using three measures. The results demonstrate positive correlations between all three factors and L2 literary metaphor comprehension. Both L2 proficiency and crystallized intelligence play a significant role across all levels of metaphor complexity. Crystallized intelligence has a greater influence on literary metaphor comprehension, whereas L2 proficiency is the strongest predictor of non-literary metaphor understanding. In contrast, fluid intelligence functions as a predictor in literary metaphors but has a negligible effect on non-literary metaphors. These findings indicate that both analogical reasoning and conceptual integration are the underlying mechanisms of L2 metaphor interpretation, though their relative contributions vary depending on metaphor complexity. The study verifies the pedagogical significance of enhancing L2 proficiency and crystallized intelligence (cultural knowledge accumulation) in fostering L2 learners’ metaphor comprehension competence. Moreover, for the interpretation of metaphors with high cognitive complexity, training in fluid intelligence may also be beneficial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251386616
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metaphor Comprehension of Chinese Learners of English: Individual Differences Perspective

T. Y. Wang, Jiang Gaofeng
SAGE Open
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

Metaphor Comprehension of Chinese Learners of English: Individual Differences Perspective

T. Y. Wang, Jiang Gaofeng
article en

Abstract

The mechanisms underlying metaphor comprehension, particularly the roles of analogical reasoning and language-specific conceptual integration have long been debated, with most studies focusing on English as L1 while paying limited attention to L2 contexts. Based on that, this study explores how three individual difference factors—fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, and L2 proficiency—influence the comprehension of L2 metaphors with varying degrees of complexity among Chinese EFL learners. Since fluid intelligence is closely associated with analogical reasoning, while crystallized intelligence facilitates the language-specific conceptual combination, this study further investigates their respective contributions, alongside L2 proficiency, to metaphor comprehension. Adopting an individual-difference approach, this study investigated Chinese learners’ metaphorical competence using three measures. The results demonstrate positive correlations between all three factors and L2 literary metaphor comprehension. Both L2 proficiency and crystallized intelligence play a significant role across all levels of metaphor complexity. Crystallized intelligence has a greater influence on literary metaphor comprehension, whereas L2 proficiency is the strongest predictor of non-literary metaphor understanding. In contrast, fluid intelligence functions as a predictor in literary metaphors but has a negligible effect on non-literary metaphors. These findings indicate that both analogical reasoning and conceptual integration are the underlying mechanisms of L2 metaphor interpretation, though their relative contributions vary depending on metaphor complexity. The study verifies the pedagogical significance of enhancing L2 proficiency and crystallized intelligence (cultural knowledge accumulation) in fostering L2 learners’ metaphor comprehension competence. Moreover, for the interpretation of metaphors with high cognitive complexity, training in fluid intelligence may also be beneficial.

SAGE OpenVol. 15(4)
Xiamen University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.