Livin’ in the Future: Analyzing State Statutes on Video Teleconferencing in Criminal Court Proceedings

There has been a drastic increase in the use of video teleconferencing (VTC) in judicial proceedings since the COVID-19 pandemic, which has sparked debate about the appropriateness of incorporating this new technology into courts’ routine operations. A systematic review of state laws on using video teleconferencing technology in criminal court proceedings shows courts across the United States are cautiously embracing the convenience of remote proceedings. However, legislators are more conservative about using video teleconferencing in higher-stakes proceedings such as evidentiary hearings and sentencing hearings, by either prohibiting the use or requiring the parties’ consent. Other aspects of state statutes include special rules for child witnesses, expert witnesses, and incarcerated individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Criminal Justice Policy Review
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08874034251383944
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Livin’ in the Future: Analyzing State Statutes on Video Teleconferencing in Criminal Court Proceedings

April Kraft-Duley, Ruibin Lu, Craig Hemmens, Michael Klein
Criminal Justice Policy Review
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

Livin’ in the Future: Analyzing State Statutes on Video Teleconferencing in Criminal Court Proceedings

April Kraft-Duley, Ruibin Lu, Craig Hemmens, Michael Klein
article en

Abstract

There has been a drastic increase in the use of video teleconferencing (VTC) in judicial proceedings since the COVID-19 pandemic, which has sparked debate about the appropriateness of incorporating this new technology into courts’ routine operations. A systematic review of state laws on using video teleconferencing technology in criminal court proceedings shows courts across the United States are cautiously embracing the convenience of remote proceedings. However, legislators are more conservative about using video teleconferencing in higher-stakes proceedings such as evidentiary hearings and sentencing hearings, by either prohibiting the use or requiring the parties’ consent. Other aspects of state statutes include special rules for child witnesses, expert witnesses, and incarcerated individuals.

Criminal Justice Policy Review
University of Southern Indiana (US), Stockton University (US), Washington State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.