Statistical analysis and treatment method of head checks on the Belgian railway network

• Statistical analysis of head checks (HC) is performed from 212 curved tracks in Belgium. • Tracks with radii between 750 and 1000 m have the highest HC growth rate of 1.5 mm/100 MGT. • HC growth per MGT is higher on lines with lower annual traffic loads. • A new method is proposed to estimate the magic wear rate and optimal grinding interval for HC treatment. This paper investigates the growth and treatment of a major type of rail rolling contact fatigue (RCF) known as head checks (HCs). The analysis is based on extensive field data of 212 curved tracks made of R260 steel across the entire Belgian railway network. The HC crack depth was mainly measured by eddy current testing. The growth rates of HCs are analysed in relation to the curve radius, annual traffic load, and rail wear. The key findings are as follows: 1) Tracks with radii between 750 and 1000 m exhibit the highest HC growth rate of about 1.5 mm per 100 million gross tons (MGT) and the largest occurrence probability of about 25 %. 2) A counterintuitive result is that the HC growth per MGT is higher on lines with lower annual traffic loads, consistent with the trend observed in rail wear rates. 3) The artificial wear methods to control RCF, such as preventive grinding, should consider annual traffic load and service time, rather than solely accumulated tonnage, as is the current practice. Based on these findings, a new method is proposed to estimate the magic wear rate for the Belgian railways, which can serve as input for optimising grinding operations to mitigate HCs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Fatigue
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.109349
Primary Topic
Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Statistical analysis and treatment method of head checks on the Belgian railway network

Rolf Dollevoet, Alfredo Núñez, Tim Vernaillen, Pan Zhang et al.
International Journal of Fatigue
Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
article

Statistical analysis and treatment method of head checks on the Belgian railway network

Rolf Dollevoet, Alfredo Núñez, Tim Vernaillen, Pan Zhang, Zili Li
article en

Abstract

• Statistical analysis of head checks (HC) is performed from 212 curved tracks in Belgium. • Tracks with radii between 750 and 1000 m have the highest HC growth rate of 1.5 mm/100 MGT. • HC growth per MGT is higher on lines with lower annual traffic loads. • A new method is proposed to estimate the magic wear rate and optimal grinding interval for HC treatment. This paper investigates the growth and treatment of a major type of rail rolling contact fatigue (RCF) known as head checks (HCs). The analysis is based on extensive field data of 212 curved tracks made of R260 steel across the entire Belgian railway network. The HC crack depth was mainly measured by eddy current testing. The growth rates of HCs are analysed in relation to the curve radius, annual traffic load, and rail wear. The key findings are as follows: 1) Tracks with radii between 750 and 1000 m exhibit the highest HC growth rate of about 1.5 mm per 100 million gross tons (MGT) and the largest occurrence probability of about 25 %. 2) A counterintuitive result is that the HC growth per MGT is higher on lines with lower annual traffic loads, consistent with the trend observed in rail wear rates. 3) The artificial wear methods to control RCF, such as preventive grinding, should consider annual traffic load and service time, rather than solely accumulated tonnage, as is the current practice. Based on these findings, a new method is proposed to estimate the magic wear rate for the Belgian railways, which can serve as input for optimising grinding operations to mitigate HCs.

International Journal of FatigueVol. 203
Infrabel (Belgium) (BE), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.