Experiments on a vapor compression air conditioner with liquid desiccants for efficient dehumidification

• Tested hybrid vapor-compression + liquid desiccant system at 26 conditions. • Validated numerical model with experiments. • Most measured moisture removal efficiencies (MRE) are between 2.8 to 6.1 kg/kWh. • Two tests with supply dewpoint of −2.1 °C had MRE of 1.9. • Modeling shows adding the liquid desiccant lowers electric power use by 25 %. Buildings require air conditioning systems that not only cool and dehumidify supply air but also provide sufficient ventilation to ensure indoor air quality and occupant comfort. However, standard recirculation systems—which introduce about a 10 % to 20 % fraction of outdoor air—often fail to deliver air that is precisely cooled and dry, particularly because 80–90 % of the ventilation cooling load is latent. Mixing humid ventilation air with recirculated indoor air increases the energy and costs required to condition the air to comfortable levels. Dedicated outdoor air systems (DOASs) are designed to handle this latent dominated ventilation load and thus need to have efficient humidity removal. Many cooling cycles can perform this task. Here we describe a liquid desiccant DOAS, which combines a vapor compression cycle and a liquid desiccant absorber and desorber pair. We present its performance at 26 operating conditions and a thermodynamic model which can accurately predict the moisture removal efficiency. The model’s performance predictions have a mean percentage error of 2.5 % and a coefficient of variation of the root mean square error of 7.5 %. We also compare the performance of this vapor-compression-coupled liquid desiccant system with a standard vapor compression system with the same components but no liquid desiccant. For the 26 conditions tested in this study, this comparison shows that adding liquid desiccants lowers the required evaporator cooling load by 21 %, allows for 25 % lower compressor volumetric capacity, and 25 % lower electricity use. Future work will leverage this model to quantify the reduction in annual electricity use across different climates, including the need for a standard vapor compression system to reheat the air during some of the year.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120683
Primary Topic
Adsorption and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiments on a vapor compression air conditioner with liquid desiccants for efficient dehumidification

Jason Woods, Zechao Lu, Eric Kozubal, Greg Shoukas
Energy Conversion and Management
Adsorption and Cooling Systems
article

Experiments on a vapor compression air conditioner with liquid desiccants for efficient dehumidification

Jason Woods, Zechao Lu, Eric Kozubal, Greg Shoukas
article en

Abstract

• Tested hybrid vapor-compression + liquid desiccant system at 26 conditions. • Validated numerical model with experiments. • Most measured moisture removal efficiencies (MRE) are between 2.8 to 6.1 kg/kWh. • Two tests with supply dewpoint of −2.1 °C had MRE of 1.9. • Modeling shows adding the liquid desiccant lowers electric power use by 25 %. Buildings require air conditioning systems that not only cool and dehumidify supply air but also provide sufficient ventilation to ensure indoor air quality and occupant comfort. However, standard recirculation systems—which introduce about a 10 % to 20 % fraction of outdoor air—often fail to deliver air that is precisely cooled and dry, particularly because 80–90 % of the ventilation cooling load is latent. Mixing humid ventilation air with recirculated indoor air increases the energy and costs required to condition the air to comfortable levels. Dedicated outdoor air systems (DOASs) are designed to handle this latent dominated ventilation load and thus need to have efficient humidity removal. Many cooling cycles can perform this task. Here we describe a liquid desiccant DOAS, which combines a vapor compression cycle and a liquid desiccant absorber and desorber pair. We present its performance at 26 operating conditions and a thermodynamic model which can accurately predict the moisture removal efficiency. The model’s performance predictions have a mean percentage error of 2.5 % and a coefficient of variation of the root mean square error of 7.5 %. We also compare the performance of this vapor-compression-coupled liquid desiccant system with a standard vapor compression system with the same components but no liquid desiccant. For the 26 conditions tested in this study, this comparison shows that adding liquid desiccants lowers the required evaporator cooling load by 21 %, allows for 25 % lower compressor volumetric capacity, and 25 % lower electricity use. Future work will leverage this model to quantify the reduction in annual electricity use across different climates, including the need for a standard vapor compression system to reheat the air during some of the year.

Energy Conversion and ManagementVol. 348
National Laboratory of the Rockies (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Adsorption and Cooling Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.