Who Am I Today? Roles Occupied While Conducting Feminist Informed Interviews With Women Who Use Drugs

There have been increased calls for researchers to be more attentive to how their ‘roles’ can influence participants and data generation processes. This remains uniquely true for those conducting research with women who use drugs and are housing insecure who experience diverse vulnerabilities. Despite these calls, there remains limited guidance for early career researchers who intend to engage these groups in research, furthering harm. Drawing on a reflexive analysis of a series of feminist-informed interviews conducted with women who use drugs and experience housing insecurity living in Ontario, Canada, I illustrate how diverse not attributed to me by participants shaped data generation. The roles I believe were attributed to me through the interviews include being a “ Service Provider, ” “Sensitive Listener,” “Relatable Person,” and a “Good Kid .” I argue that early career researchers must leverage practices such as reflexivity to consider how elements of one’s positionality influence researcher’s ability to achieve the goals of feminist-informed interviewing. This paper ends with guidance for early career researchers on how to create safe and inclusive research practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Qualitative Research
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19408447251386494
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Am I Today? Roles Occupied While Conducting Feminist Informed Interviews With Women Who Use Drugs

Melissa Perri
International Review of Qualitative Research
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Who Am I Today? Roles Occupied While Conducting Feminist Informed Interviews With Women Who Use Drugs

Melissa Perri
article en

Abstract

There have been increased calls for researchers to be more attentive to how their ‘roles’ can influence participants and data generation processes. This remains uniquely true for those conducting research with women who use drugs and are housing insecure who experience diverse vulnerabilities. Despite these calls, there remains limited guidance for early career researchers who intend to engage these groups in research, furthering harm. Drawing on a reflexive analysis of a series of feminist-informed interviews conducted with women who use drugs and experience housing insecurity living in Ontario, Canada, I illustrate how diverse not attributed to me by participants shaped data generation. The roles I believe were attributed to me through the interviews include being a “ Service Provider, ” “Sensitive Listener,” “Relatable Person,” and a “Good Kid .” I argue that early career researchers must leverage practices such as reflexivity to consider how elements of one’s positionality influence researcher’s ability to achieve the goals of feminist-informed interviewing. This paper ends with guidance for early career researchers on how to create safe and inclusive research practices.

International Review of Qualitative Research
University of Toronto (CA), Public Health Ontario (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.